(A) Varenicline (nicotine partial agonist) and (B) Bupropion (norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor with nicotine antagonist properties when metabolised). Bars represent mean and error bars represent + SEM. Asterisk (*) represents significance at p<0.05.

Figure 1—source data 1.

(A) Breeding and selection to assess heritability of nicotine-induced place preference in ENU-mutagenized zebrafish. To test whether nicotine preference is heritable, fish in the upper (blue circle) and lower (red circle) 10% of the change in preference distribution curve were inbred and screened for CPP (Second generation CPP assay). A similar approach was used for the third generation CPP assay. (B) CPP for nicotine is heritable. Mean preference change is increasingly distinct for the second and third generation CPP analysis. Plot represents mean and ± SEM. First generation (corresponding to the F₃ families used for the screen) (n = 120): mean = 0.11; SD = 0.17. Second generation: Offspring of fish from upper 10% of the first generation screen (n = 92): mean = 0.17; SD = 0.14. Offspring of fish from lower 10% of the first generation screen (n = 64): mean = 0.08; SD = 0.15. Third generation. Offspring of fish from upper 10% of the second generation screen (n = 69): mean = 0.21; SD = 0.10. Offspring of fish from lower 10% of the second generation screen (n = 67): mean = 0.01; SD = 0.09.

Figure 2—source data 1.

AJBQM1 and AJBQM2 siblings, not included in the screen (n = 10 for AJBQM1; n = 14 for AJBQM2), AJBQM1 significantly differed from the parental strain, Tupfel longfin (TLF) wild type (w/t) saline control (n = 17) and wild type nicotine exposed fish (n = 7). AJBQM2 differed from wild type nicotine exposed fish but not wild type saline controls. Different superscript letters indicate significant difference between groups (p<0.05), same superscript letters indicate no significant differences between groups. Bars indicate Mean + SEM.

Figure 3—source data 1.

(A) Segregation of slit3^sa1569 mutation with nicotine seeking. CPP change scores for individual un-mutagenized TLF wild type fish (n = 7) and AJBQM1 fish (n = 10). Following CPP analysis, fish were genotyped for 25 loss of function mutations contained within the family. Black dots indicate slit3^sa1569/+ heterozygous mutant fish. White dots indicate slit3^sa1569+/+ fish. Heterozygosity for slit3^sa1569 segregates with increased nicotine seeking behaviour. (B) Position of ENU-induced mutations in zebrafish Slit3 protein. slit3^sa1569 (A > G transition) disrupts a splice site in intron seven affecting translation at amino acid 176. slit3^sa202 (G > T transversion) introduces a stop codon at amino acid 163. Both mutations truncate the protein before the leucine rich repeat domain 2 (D2), which interacts with membrane bound ROBO during SLIT-ROBO signalling. (C) Nicotine preference of slit3^sa202 line. slit3^sa202/+ fish (n = 18) show increased nicotine preference compared to wild type TLF controls (n = 8) (p=0.001) and wild type siblings slit3^+/+ (n = 14) (p<0.05). Bars indicate mean + SEM. (D) Segregation of slit3^sa202 allele with nicotine seeking. CPP change scores for individual un-mutagenised TLF wild type parent strain fish (n = 8) and slit3^sa202 fish (n = 21). Black dots indicate slit3^sa202/+ heterozygous mutant fish, white dots indicate slit3^sa202+/+ fish. Mutations in slit3^sa202 co-segregate with nicotine preference. Heterozygous slit3^+/sa202 present increased place preference compared to slit3^sa202+/+ siblings (n = 11).

(A–D) Anti-5-HT, (E–M) anti-TH: (A) 5-HT-labelled neurons in wild type zebrafish brain. Circles indicate regions used for quantification of cell number in rostral hypothalamus (RH), inferior hypothalamic lobes (HL-R, HL-L) and raphe nucleus (RN). (B) Anti-5-HT labelled cells in slit3 wild type brain, (C) Anti-5-HT labelled cells in slit3sa1569 homozygous mutant brain. (D) Quantification of anti-5HT labelled cell number in wild type and slit3 mutant brains No significant differences were observed between wild type and slit3 mutant larvae. (E) Unprocessed maximum intensity projection of anti-TH-labelled whole mounted wild type zebrafish brain. Circles indicate areas used for quantification, or in the case of LC-R and LC-L, landmarks used as reference to determine the extension of the medial longitudinal catecholaminergic tract (MLC) used when quantifying the number of anti-TH labelled projections to the midline (panels L, M). (F) Cell quantification for diencephalic dopaminergic cluster (DDC). No significant differences were observed between wild type and slit3 mutant larvae. (G) Cell quantification for medulla oblongata interfascicular zone and vagal area, and area postrema (MO, AP). No significant differences were observed between wild type and slit3 mutant larvae. (H–K) Anti-TH labelled wild types and slit3sa1569. Zoomed-in visualization of diencephalic dopaminergic cluster (H–I) and medulla oblongata interfascicular zone and vagal area (J–K). (L–M) Quantification of catecholaminergic projections projecting to the midline. Examples of projections are indicated with yellow arrows. Projections were assessed from posterior to anterior using the locus coerulus and posterior extent of the raphe nucleus as landmarks (Panel L, yellow line) and from dorsal to ventral (Panel M, stacks 1–3). Figure 5—figure supplement 1 shows individual planes. n = 5 samples per genotype group.

(A) Example of three Z-planes used to quantify catecholaminergic projections crossing the midline. (Stacks 1–3). (B) Anti-tubulin staining of slbp^ty77e/ty77e mutant larvae, known to have fewer neurons and axonal defects (Turner et al., 2019). (C–D) Anti-tubulin staining of wild type and homozygous mutant slit3^sa1569. (E–F) Zoom-in of C-D for midline in the ventral forebrain, where slit3 is known to be expressed (Miyasaka et al., 2005).

(A–B) Response and habituation to 10 stimuli with two seconds interval between stimuli in wild type, drug free zebrafish. Mean distances travelled were measured in one second time bins. Line indicates 4.6 mm, which corresponds to mean basal distance moved per second plus 2 standard deviations of the mean and was used to define respondents. The percentage of fish responding to the stimuli decreases with stimulus/tap number (Main effects of tap number p<0.05) 68% respond to the first tap; 16% respond to the last tap. Respondents are defined as fish moving more than 4.6 mm. (C) Proportion of responders across the ten stimuli in drug free individuals from each genotype: there was no significant effect of genotype on response across taps (p=0.34) or responsiveness (p=0.35) in drug free fish. (D) Mean percentage of responders across the ten stimuli (± SEM). Data are stratified by slit3sa1569 genotype and amisulpride dose normalised to response in absence of drug. The effect of amisulpride on habituation varies by genotype. (E, F) Proportion of individuals responding in each amisulpride dose condition in wild type and homozygous mutant fish, respectively. The interaction between amisulpride dose and stimulus event number had a significant effect on the proportion of responsive individuals in wild type individuals (p<0.05) but not homozygous mutants (p=0.16).

(A) Basal distance moved as function of amisulpride dose and slit3 genotype. The effect of dose and genotype and their interaction was tested in a linear mixed model. Timepoint, well where the fish were placed and plate were also included as fixed factors and the fish ID as random factor. (B) Distance moved during taps as function of amisulpride dose and slit3 genotype. Dose and genotype and their interaction were examined in a linear mixed model including stimulus number, well, plate used and distance moved before stimuli as fixed factors and Fish ID as random factor. Zebrafish larvae did not differ in the distance travelled before or during startle stimuli as a function of amisulpride dose nor genotype (p>0.05). Bars represent estimated marginal means ± SEM (n = 42–48 fish per group).

Bars represent mean (+ SEM). (n = 11–14 fish per group). *Two-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey tests (p<0.05).

Figure 7—source data 1.

Quantitative PCR analysis of gene expression was performed for members of (A) dopaminergic signalling pathway, (B) adrenoreceptors, (C) serotonin signalling pathway and (D) nicotinic cholinergic receptors. (Total n=30, 3 samples per experimental group with n=10 embryos per sample). Only htr1aa ([F(2,6)=44], p=0.0003) showed a significant difference across genotypes after correcting for multiple testing. *Two-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey test (p < 0.05).

Figure 8—source data 1.

Numbers within each square indicate D’ values (white: D’<1, LOD <2; blue: D’=1, LOD <2; pink: D’<1, LOD ≥2; and bright red: D’=1, LOD ≥2). Top part of the figure shows domain organization of the SLIT protein based on the UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/) in relation to the SNP location. LRR: leucin-rich repeats. EGF: epidermal growth factor domains. LamG; Laminin G domain. Some intron numbers were added for reference.

F₂ ENU-mutagenized zebrafish, heterozygous for multiple mutations across the entire genome were obtained from the Wellcome Sanger Institute as part of the Zebrafish Mutation Project. At QMUL, heterozygous F₂ fish were incrossed to generate 30 F₃ families, each containing 10–20 nonsense or essential splice site mutations and about 1500 additional exonic and intronic point mutations. F₃ Families were arbitrarily numbered 1–30. Expected mutation rate and type of mutations in coding regions are specified on the right hand side.