(A) Experimental schematic. A? was injected into the heart of 5 dpf larvae in the morning (ZT2 = zeitgeber time 2, that is 2hr after lights on). Behavior was then monitored in a square-welled 96-well plate for 24?48 hr on a 14 hr:10 hr light:dark cycle. (B) Heart-injected HiLyteTM Fluor 647-labeled A?42 (fA?) penetrated the whole larval brain as visualized by confocal microscopy (optical sections, dorsal view) taken 2 hr after injection. Anterior is to the top. (C) A? prepared under increasing temperatures adopted longer oligomeric lengths, as measured by transmission electron microscopy. Each dot is a single oligomer (N = number measured), and the bars show the median. Data was taken from five randomly selected micrographs from two independent experiments. **p?0.01, ****p?1×10-7 Kruskal-Wallis, Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. (D, E) Exemplar 24 hr traces post-injection comparing the effect of A?short (blue) on average waking activity (D) and sleep (E) versus A?rev controls (grey). Ribbons represent ±the standard error of the mean (SEM). Light and dark bars indicate the lights ON and lights OFF periods, respectively. N = the number of larvae in each condition. (D?, E?) The effect of A?short relative to A?rev on waking (D?) and sleep (E?) during the first day is shown, pooled from n = 5 independent experiments. Each dot represents a single larva normalized to the mean of the A?rev control, and error bars indicate ± SEM. The mean difference effect size and 95% confidence interval is plotted to the right. *p<0.05, Tp <0.1, one-way ANOVA. (F, G) Exemplar 24 hr traces post-injection comparing the effect of A?long (green) on average waking activity (F) and sleep (G) versus A?rev controls (grey). (F?, G?) The effect of A?long relative to A?rev on waking (F?) and sleep (G?) during the first day is shown, pooled from n = 4 independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, one-way ANOVA. (H, I) Exemplar 24 hr traces post-injection comparing the effect of A?v_long (magenta) on average waking activity (H) and sleep (I) versus A?rev peptide controls (grey). (H?, I?) The effect of A?v_long relative to A?rev on waking (H?) and sleep (I?) during the first day is shown, pooled from n = 3 independent experiments. (J) The effect of different A? preparations on the number of sleep bouts relative to A?rev controls. The difference effect size and 95% confidence interval is plotted below. The asterisks indicate statistically significant different effects among the preps (***p<0.001, one-way ANOVA). See also Figure 1?figure supplements 1?3.

(A) Same images from Figure 1B, highlighting the region of interest in the telencephalon for fluorescence intensity measurements in B. Anterior is to the top, dorsal view. (B) Heart-injected fluorescently-tagged Aβ (black) penetrates the brain within 1 hr and peaks in concentration 2–3 hr post-injection. Cyan shows background fluorescence of a negative control. The shaded area shows ± standard deviation from three independent injections. (C) Electron micrographs of Aβ oligomers formed after 24 hr incubation at 4°C, 25°C, and 37°C. Aβ^arctic was incubated at 25°C for 2 hr as a positive control. The color code is used throughout the main and supplementary figures. Scale bar = 100 nm (D) The Aβ^short (blue) and Aβ^long (green) have opposing, dose-dependent effects on average waking activity, normalized to Aβ^rev injections. The error bars represent ±the SEM. doseXprep interaction *p≤0.05, ****p≤0.0001 two-way ANOVA, Fisher’s least significant difference post hoc test. p≤0.001, prep effect (plotted in F). (E) Aβ^short (blue) and Aβ^long (green) have opposing, dose-dependent effects on sleep. doseXprep interaction, two-way ANOVA, *p≤0.05, Fisher’s least significant difference post hoc test. p≤0.05, prep effect (plotted in G). Based on the data in D-E, 10 nM was chosen as the concentration for all subsequent Aβ injection experiments. (F) The waking activity for each larva in D, normalized to Aβ^rev injections and plotted to emphasize the significant effect of the preparation irrespective of dose (p<0.001, two-way ANOVA). (G) Sleep for each larva in E normalized to Aβ^rev injections and plotted to emphasize the significant effect of the preparation (p<0.001, two-way ANOVA). (H) Sleep plot of untreated WT (black), anesthetized only (red), mock injected (blue) and PBS injected (green) fish on a 14 hr:10 hr light:dark cycle (indicated by the white and black bars). The ribbons represent ±the SEM. (I) Sleep for each larva in H (WT (black), anesthetised only (red), mock injected (blue) and PBS injected (green)) shows that there is no statistical difference in sleep due to any of the manipulations (p>0.05, one-way ANOVA). (J) Sleep plot after vehicle injection (PBS, magenta trace) and immediate tracking compared to larvae that had acclimated to the apparatus for 24 hr (black trace). The ribbons represent ±the SEM. Gold stars flag significantly different timepoints (p<0.05, repeated measures ANOVA) and were used to determine the window for calculating the evening-only effects of Aβ injections. (K) Calculating Aβ injection effects across the whole day or only in the evening window (data from Figure 1) has minimal effect on the analysis of Aβ^short or Aβ^long. The only exception (red shading) is for the reduction in sleep by Aβ^short, due to a flooring effect.

(A) Dorsal and ventral views of representative 5 dpf larval brains stained for Caspase-3 activation (purple) to map apoptosis. Exposure to the topoisomerase inhibitor camptothecin (CPT, 1 µM), which induces apoptosis, serves as a positive control. DAPI stains nuclei in white for reference. Anterior is to the left. Scale bar = 100 µm (B,C) Quantification of the number of Caspase-3-positive cells after exposure to 1 µM CPT or Aβ oligomer injections (n = 5 brains for each condition, B-dorsal, C-ventral). Only CPT significantly increased apoptosis relative to Aβ^rev. ns, p>0.05, one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc test. (D) Survival curves to adulthood after 5dpf injection of Aβ oligomers. There are no significant differences among survival curves, p>0.05, Kaplan-Meier log rank test.

(A–B) The effects of Aβ^short (A) and Aβ^long (B) on waking activity (top) and sleep (bottom) return to baseline after 24 hr. Shown in A and B are traces for 48 hr post-injection on a 14 hr:10 hr light:dark cycle (indicated by the white and black bars). The ribbons represent ±the SEM. Plotted on the right are the percent change induced by Aβ relative to Aβ^rev for day 1 versus day 2, demonstrating that these parameters return to baseline (*p≤0.01, paired t-test). Each line represents a single larva, the thicker line represents the mean ± SEM. (C) Activity traces of Aβ^short (blue), Aβ^long (green), and Aβ^rev (black) during and after a ten minute dark pulse are indistinguishable. Traces are for a 10 min:10 min:10 min light:dark:light window (indicated by the white and black bars). The ribbons represent ±the SEM. (D) The effects of Aβ^rev (black), convulsant PTZ (10 mM, orange), Aβ^short (blue), and Aβ^long (green) on sub-second larval bout structures. Shown are delta pixel movement of one representative larva in each group for ~1 min (see Figure 1—video 1). Unlike PTZ treated larvae, Aβ injected larvae have normal bout structures. Representative larvae were chosen to also highlight that, while overall Aβ^long injected larvae are less active, individual animals can have sustained periods of heightened activity. Similarly, individual Aβ^short injected animals can exhibit periods of relatively dampened activity. (E) The effects of Aβ^rev (black), convulsant PTZ (10 mM, orange), Aβ^short (blue) and Aβ^long (green) on high-frequency bouts (HFB) in a 5 min interval. Each dot represents a single larva. PTZ-induced HFB’s is non-existent or very rare in the other groups (n = 24 for all groups).

(A) As detected by ISH, the immediate early gene c-fos is upregulated in many larval brain areas following A?short injection, including the dorsal and ventral telencephalon (tel) and the posterior hypothalamus (black arrowheads), relative to A?rev control injections. Other upregulated areas in the midbrain and hindbrain are indicated (white arrowheads). hyp- hypothalamus; hb- hindbrain. D = dorsal, p=Posterior, R = Right. n = blind counts of brains with the shown expression pattern/total brains. 24/43 stringently counts only brains with the major areas upregulated. (B) Compared to A?rev injections, A?long oligomers induce less c-fos expression. The A?rev and A?long treated brains were stained longer than in (A) to ensure detection of weaker c-fos expression. n = blind counts of number of brains with the shown expression/total brains. (C) c-fos is upregulated in many larval brain areas at 10 am (ZT1) awake fish, including the dorsal and ventral telencephalon and the posterior hypothalamus (black arrowheads), and other discrete regions of the mid and hindbrain (white arrowheads). c-fos expression is downregulated in later timepoints (ZT13) and is very low in ZT19 brains, when larvae are predominantly asleep. N = 10 fish/timepoint. (D, D?) Brain expression of the neuronal activity correlate pERK/tERK comparing A?short (n = 6) to A?rev (n = 5) injected larvae identified areas upregulated (green) and downregulated (magenta) by A?short. Data are shown as a thresholded maximum projection overlaid on the Z-Brain Atlas tERK reference (gray). White arrowheads indicate regions in the ventral telencephalon and posterior hypothalamus that are upregulated similar to c-fos in (A). Dorsal view in (D), lateral view in (D?). (E, E?) pERK/tERK expression after A?long injections (n = 7) shows widespread downregulation of neuronal activity (magenta) compared to A?rev controls (n = 7), consistent with c-fos data in (B). Dorsal view in (E), lateral view in (E?). (F) As detected by ISH, the number and intensity of hypothalamic galanin-positive neurons are downregulated following A?short injection and upregulated following A?long injection, relative to A?rev control injections. Representative images from N = 22?24 per condition. (G) Normalized, blinded counts of hypothalamic galanin-positive cell numbers 4?6 hr after A?short and A?long injections, relative to A?rev. Error bars indicate ± SEM. The mean difference effect size and 95% confidence interval is plotted at the bottom. **p<0.01, one-way ANOVA. See also Figure 2?source datas 1 and 2.

(A-D?) Exemplar 24 hr traces comparing the effects of A?short oligomers on average waking activity (A-D) and sleep (A?-D?) versus A?rev injected into wild type (A,A?), adrb2a-/- (B,B?), pgrmc1-/- (C,C?), and prp1-/-;prp2-/- mutants (D,D?). (E-H) The effect of A?short relative to A?rev on normalized waking activity (E and F) and sleep (G and H) during the first day is shown. Each dot represents a single larva normalized to the mean of the A?rev control, and error bars indicate ± SEM. The mean difference effect size and 95% confidence interval are plotted below. N = the number of larvae. The wake inducing and sleep suppressing effects of A?short are absent in (E,G) adrb2a-/- and pgrmc1-/- but enhanced in prp1-/-;prp2-/- mutants (F,H). nsp>0.05, *p?0.05, **p?0.01, ***p?0.0001, ****p?10?5 one-way ANOVA. Data is pooled from n = 2 independent experiments for adrb2a-/-and pgrmc1-/- and n = 3 for prp1-/-;prp2-/-. See also Figure 3?figure supplements 1 and 2.

(A) Human PGRMC1and zebrafish Pgrmc1 contain a conserved Transmembrane (TM) domain (yellow) and a Cytochrome b5-like Heme/Steroid binding domain (blue). (B) Protein alignment of zebrafish Pgrmc1 to human PGRMC1. Identical residues are marked in black, similar residues in grey. (C) Crispr-Cas9 targeting of pgrmc1 generated an allele with a 16 bp deletion. The PAM sequence is indicated in red. (D) The predicted translation of pgrmc1 Δ16 leads to a premature stop codon. (E) Protein alignment of zebrafish Adrb2a and Adrb2b to human ADRB2. Identical residues are marked in black, similar residues in grey. The N-terminal region (pink) is the putative Aβ binding region. The C-terminal region is in green. (F) Crispr-Cas9 targeting of adrb2a generated an allele with an 8 bp deletion. The PAM sequence is indicated in red. (G) The predicted translation of adrb2aΔ8 leads to a premature stop codon lacking all functional domains.

(A–C’) Sleep and waking activity plots for larvae from pgrmc1^+/- in crosses. (A,A’) show representative 48 hr traces for the indicated genotypes. The ribbon represents ± SEM. (B–C’) Sleep and waking activity for each larva for all genotypes are plotted. The error bars represent the mean ± SEM. There is a trend to decreased waking activity in pgrmc1^-/- mutants compared to wild-type siblings. p=0.07, Kruskal-Wallis, Tukey-Kramer post-hoc. (D–F’) Sleep and waking activity plots for larvae from adrb2a^+/- in crosses. (D,D’) show 48 hr traces for all three genotypes. The ribbon represents ± SEM. (E–F’) Sleep and waking activity for the day and night are plotted for each larva. The error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Compared to both wild type and heterozygous siblings, adrb2a^-/- mutants have increased sleep during the day. *p≤0.05, Kruskal-Wallis, Tukey-Kramer post-hoc.

(A-B?) Exemplar 24 hr traces comparing the effects of A?long oligomers on average waking activity (A,B) and sleep (A?-B?) versus A?rev on wild type (A,A?), and prp1-/-;prp2-/- mutant (B,B?) backgrounds. (C-D) The effect of A?long relative to A?rev on normalized waking (C) and sleep (D) on wild type and prp1-/-;prp2-/- mutant backgrounds (mixed prp3 background) during the first day is shown. The activity reducing (C) and sleep promoting (D) effects of A?long are blocked in prp1-/-;prp2-/- mutants. **p?0.01, ****p?10?5 one-way ANOVA. Data is pooled from n = 3 independent experiments. See also Figure 4?figure supplements 1 and 2.

(A) Schematic comparing zebrafish Prp1-3 proteins to human PrP. SP, signal peptide (dark grey); R, repetitive region (blue); HD, hydrophobic domain (yellow); N, glycosylation sites (black lines); GPI anchor residue (triangle); hydrophobic tail (coral). Aβ oligomer binding regions are shown in red. Breakpoints at repetitive regions indicate length variation. Adapted from Cotto et al., 2005. (B) Protein alignments of zebrafish Prp1, Prp2, and Prp3 proteins to human and mouse PrP proteins. Identical residues are marked in black, similar residues in grey. Aβ oligomer binding sites are indicated in red. The site of truncation mutations in prp1 and prp2 mutants are indicated with a triangle.

(A-C’) Sleep and waking activity plots for larvae from prp1^+/-; prp2^+/- in crosses. (A,A’) show representative 48 hr traces for the indicated genotypes. The ribbon represents ± SEM. (B–C’) Sleep and waking activity for each larva for all genotypes are plotted. The error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (D–F’) Sleep and waking activity plots for larvae from prp1^+/-;prp2^-/- in crosses. (D, D’) show 48 hr traces for all three genotypes. The ribbon represents ± SEM. (E–F’) Sleep and waking activity for the day and night are plotted for each larva. The error bars represent the mean ± SEM.

(A) After Aβ^short injection into WT larvae (top right), c-fos is detected in many larval brain areas, including the dorsal and ventral telencephalon and posterior hypothalamus (black arrowheads), but not after injection of Aβ reverse controls (left). In contrast, Aβ^short injections into either adrb2a^-/- (middle right) or pgrmc1^-/- mutants (bottom right) do not induce c-fos expression. The brains in the middle and lower panels were stained longer than the WT (+/+) brains to ensure detection of weaker expression. D = dorsal, p=Posterior. n = blinded counts of brains with expression pattern/total brains. (B) Compared to Aβ^rev injections, Aβ^long oligomers induce less c-fos expression in WT larvae (top panels). In contrast, Aβ^long induced relatively increased c-fos expression in the telencephalon and posterior hypothalamus (black arrows) in the prp1^-/-; prp2 ^-/- double mutants. These Aβ^rev and Aβ^longinjectedbrains were stained longer to ensure detection of weaker c-fos expression. D = dorsal, p=Posterior.

(A) Schematic showing how A??Prp interactions signal through mGluR5 to activate Fyn kinase, leading to synaptic changes (Nygaard et al., 2014). Small molecules that block each step in the pathway are indicated. (B) Representative traces of sleep behavior after A?long versus A?rev injections in the absence (left) or presence (right) of the A?-Prion binding disruptor, Chicago Sky Blue 6B (3 nM). Ribbons represent ± SEM. (C) The effect of A?long relative to A?rev on normalized sleep during the first day in the in the absence or presence of 3 nM Chicago Sky Blue 6B. The data is pooled from n = 2 independent experiments **p?0.01, one-way ANOVA. (D) Representative traces of sleep behavior after A?long versus A?rev injections in the presence of mGluR5 inhibitor MPEP (5 uM, left) and Fyn Kinase inhibitor saracatinib (300 nM, right). Ribbons represent ± SEM. (E) The effect of A?long relative to A?rev on normalized sleep during the first day in the absence or presence of 5 uM MPEP (left) and 300 nM saracatinib (right). Each dot represents a single larva normalized to the mean A?rev. Data is pooled from two independent experiments. **p?0.01, ****p?10?5 one-way ANOVA. (F) The effect of a 1:1 mixture of A?long to A?short relative to single injections of A?rev, A?short, and A?long on normalized sleep during the first day. The data is pooled from n = 4 independent experiments. (G) A bi-directional model for sleep/wake regulation by A?. In wild-type animals (centre), injection of A?short species signal through Adrb2a/Pgrmc1 to drive wakefulness while A?long oligomers signal via Prp to induce sleep. In mutants that lack Prp (left), only A?short species (as shown by the overlapping distributions) remain to inhibit sleep with no residual A?long oligomers to stimulate the sleep-inducing pathway to counteract wake-inducing signals. Thus prp1-/-; prp2-/- mutants have enhanced wakefulness in response to A?. Conversely, mutants that lack Adrb2a/Pgrmc1 (right), retain only the sleep-promoting A? pathway and fail to increase wakefulness in response to A?short. See also Figure 6?figure supplement 1.

(A) Representative traces of waking activity after Aβ^long versus Aβ^rev injections in wild type larvae in the absence (left) or presence (right) of the Aβ-Prp binding disruptor, Chicago Sky Blue 6B (3 nM). The data are from the same injections as in Figure 6B. Ribbons represent ± SEM. Light and dark bars indicate the lights ON and lights OFF periods, respectively. (B) The change in normalized waking activity induced by Aβ^long versus Aβ^rev control injections in the absence or presence of 3 nM Chicago Sky Blue 6B. Each dot represents a single larva and error bars indicate ± SEM. The mean difference effect size and 95% confidence interval is plotted at the bottom. N = the number of larvae in each group. **p≤0.01, Kruskal-Wallis, Tukey-Kramer post hoc. (C) Representative traces of sleep behavior after Aβ^long versus Aβ^rev injections (left) in the presence of the mGluR5 inhibitor, MPEP (5 μM) and (right) Src-kinase inhibitor, saracatinib (300 nM). Ribbons represent ± SEM. The data are from the same injections as in Figure 6D. (D) The change in sleep induced by Aβ^long relative to Aβ^rev control injections in the presence of MPEP (5 μM) and (300 nM) saracatinib. *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, Kruskal-Wallis, Tukey-Kramer post hoc.