Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
- ID
- ZDB-FIG-210503-87
- Publication
- Avitan et al., 2021 - Spontaneous and evoked activity patterns diverge over development
- Other Figures
- All Figure Page
- Back to All Figure Page
(A) The area covered by the smallest polygon bounding the assembly shows no developmental trend (one-way ANOVA). (B) The area covered by spontaneous activity (SA) assemblies is larger than the area covered by evoked activity (TEA) assemblies (t-test). (C) Assembly tuning variance shows no developmental trend (one-way ANOVA, p=0.66, p=0.62 for SA and TEA respectively). (D) Tuning variance over the anterior-posterior (AP) axis shows a decrease in tuning variance as a function of the assembly centre of mass (CoM). Linear regression EA: p=10−4 for 4 dpf, p=10−4 for 5 dpf, p=10−4 for 9 dpf, p=10−4 for 15 dpf; SA: p=10−2 for 4 dpf, p=10−3 for 5 dpf, p=0.03 for 9 dpf, p=0.09 for 15 dpf. |