FIGURE SUMMARY
Title

A Kupffer's vesicle size threshold for robust left-right patterning of the zebrafish embryo

Authors
Gokey, J.J., Ji, Y., Tay, H.G., Litts, B., Amack, J.D.
Source
Full text @ Dev. Dyn.

Analysis of variation in development of Kupffer′s vesicle in wild-type embryos. A–C: Representative maximum projections of confocal images of KV cells labeled with aPKC antibodies (magenta) to mark the KV lumen and acetylated Tubulin antibodies (green) to visualize cilia at 8 ss. These examples show a TAB wild-type embryo with small KV size and few cilia (A) and embryos with an intermediate (B) or larger (C) lumen size. D–F: Quantification of KV cilia number (D), cilia length (E), and lumen area (F) at 4 ss (n = 26 embryos), 6 ss (n = 23), 8 ss (n = 30), and 10 ss (n = 30). The horizontal line in the box and whisker plots indicates the mean and the whiskers show the minimum and maximum values. G: Variations in cilia number, cilia length, and lumen size at each developmental stage are represented as one standard deviation converted to a percentage of the mean.

The amount of variation in Kupffer′s vesicle development is similar among different wild-type and transgenic strains. A–C: Images of KV at 8 ss from three different transgenic strains. KVs appeared similar in most strains, including Tg(myl7:GFP) (A) and Tg(sox17:GFP) (B), but were smaller inTg(h2afx:EGFP-rab11a) (C). See text for descriptions of each strain. D–F: Analysis of KV cilia number (D), cilia length (E), and lumen area (F) at 8 ss for different wild-type (TL and AB) and several transgenic strains. Data from wild-type TAB strain at 8 ss presented in Figure 1 are included for comparison. The number of embryos (N) analyzed for each strain is indicated in (G). G: Variations in cilia number, cilia length, and lumen size are represented as one standard deviation as a percentage of the mean. H,I: Analysis of potential correlations between KV lumen area and cilia number (H) and KV lumen area and cilia length (I). Each point represents a single embryo (n = 292 embryos). The R2 (coefficient of determination) value is listed for all strains pooled.

Role of Kupffer′s vesicle size in LR patterning. A–D: Modulating Cftr activity was used to alter KV lumen size at 8 ss. The Cftr activating drug CFTact-09 increased KV size (B), whereas a loss-of-function mutation (C) or morpholino (MO) interference (D) reduced KV size relative to controls (A). Dashed circles represent approximate KV lumen boundaries. E–H: Possible outcomes of RNA in situ hybridization analysis of the LR patterning marker spaw in lateral plate mesoderm (arrowhead) at 18 ss are normal left-sided (E), bilateral (F), reversed right-sided (G), or absent (H) expression. Dashed lines indicate the embryonic midline. L = left; R = right. I–K: Quantification of KV area (I), cilia number (J), and cilia length (K) in embryos with altered Cftr function and controls. L: Analysis of spaw expression in Cftr modulated embryos. Error bars represent one standard deviation. N = number of embryos analyzed. * indicates P < 0.05.

Identification of a Kupffer′s vesicle size threshold necessary for robust LR patterning. A–D: Representative DIC images of different sized KVs in living wild-type embryos at 8 ss. The KVmax area is indicated for each representative embryo. (A′-D′) spaw expression (arrowhead) at 18 ss in the same embryos. Dashed lines indicate the embryonic midline. L = left; R = right. E–H: Analysis of spaw asymmetry in embryos in which KV was measured at 8ss (E,F) or 3 ss (G,H). E,G: Normal (left-sided) and altered (bilateral, reversed or absent) spaw outcomes were plotted based on KVmax area. Each point represents a single embryo. F,H: Observed spaw expression in embryos within specific ranges of KVmax areas. N = number of embryos analyzed.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Dev. Dyn.