FIGURE

Fig. 5

ID
ZDB-FIG-250506-5
Publication
Wang et al., 2024 - Reprogramming miR-146b-snphb Signaling Activates Axonal Mitochondrial Transport in the Zebrafish M-cell and Facilitates Axon Regeneration After Injury
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 5

Reprogramming miR-146b-snphb signaling activates M-cell axonal mitochondrial transport. A Schematic diagram of miR-146b overexpression system and mitochondrial tracer vector. UAS-mito-EGFP: plasmid that labels mitochondria with EGFP signaling. B Time-point diagram of mitochondrial dynamic imaging and axotomy. C Representative images of moving mitochondria tracked by in vivo time-lapse confocal imaging in the M-cell axon (arrowheads trace a motile mitochondrion). Scale bar, 5 μm. D Kymographs depict mitochondrial movement at 6 dpf, 24 hpa, and 48 hpa in the control and miR-146b OE group. E Reprogramming miR-146b signaling resulted in an increase in the proportion of motile mitochondria in the M-cell and the velocity of mitochondria moving in the anterograde direction at 6 dpf. Total: control: 34.35% ± 1.70% vs. miR-146b: 46.73% ± 1.51%, *** P < 0.001; antro: control: 25.72% ± 1.75% vs. miR-146b: 33.90% ± 2.45%, ** P < 0.01; retro: control: 8.63% ± 1.59% vs. miR-146b: 12.83% ± 2.31%. Velocity: total: control: 0.44 ± 0.015 μm/s, n = 194 mitos vs. miR-146b: 0.47 ± 0.012 μm/s, n = 232 mitos; antro: control: 0.404 ± 0.013 μm/s, n = 147 mitos vs. miR-146b: 0.445 ± 0.012 μm/s, n = 169 mitos, * P < 0.05; retro: control: 0.553 ± 0.04 μm/s, n = 47 mitos vs. miR-146b: 0.534 ± 0.032 μm/s, n = 63 mitos (24 videos of 8 fishes per group). F Overexpression of miR-146b promoted the proportion of mobile mitochondria and the velocity of mitochondria in the M-cell axon at 24 hpa. Total: control: 18.22% ± 1.63% vs. miR-146b: 26.43% ± 1.76%, ** P < 0.01; antro: control: 7.96% ± 1.78% vs. miR-146b: 17.69% ± 1.86%, ** P < 0.01; retro: control: 10.26% ± 2.00% vs. miR-146b: 8.73% ± 1.41%. Velocity: total: control: 0.182 ± 0.014 μm/s, n = 48 mitos vs. miR-146b: 0.258 ± 0.009 μm/s, n = 151 mitos, *** P < 0.001; antro: control: 0.199 ± 0.021 μm/s, n = 20 mitos vs. miR-146b: 0.253 ± 0.010 μm/s, n = 98 mitos, * P < 0.05; retro: control: 0.170 ± 0.019 μm/s, n = 28 mitos vs. miR-146b: 0.268 ± 0.018 μm/s, n = 53 mitos, *** P < 0.001 (control: 11 videos from 4 fishes; miR-146b: 18 videos from 6 fishes). G Overexpression of miR-146b barely affected mitochondrial trafficking of the M-cell axon at 48 hpa. Total: control: 27.54% ± 3.21% vs. miR-146b: 24.41% ± 3.28%; antro: control: 18.84% ± 3.14% vs. miR-146b: 18.18% ± 2.26%; retro: control: 8.69% ± 1.79% vs. miR-146b: 6.23% ± 1.74%. Velocity: total: control: 0.250 ± 0.013 μm/s, n = 52 mitos vs. miR-146b: 0.225 ± 0.007 μm/s, n = 162 mitos; antro: control: 0.263 ± 0.013 μm/s, n = 37 mitos vs. miR-146b: 0.223 ± 0.009 μm/s, n = 119 mitos, * P < 0.05; retro: control: 0.220 ± 0.029 μm/s, n = 15 mitos vs. miR-146b: 0.218 ± 0.015 μm/s, n = 44 mitos (control: 6 videos from 2 fishes; miR-146b: 18 videos from 6 fishes).

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Neurosci. Bull.