FIGURE

Fig. 1.

ID
ZDB-FIG-241210-7
Publication
Xie et al., 2024 - EFEMP1 contributes to light-dependent ocular growth in zebrafish
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 1.

Genotypic details of retina-specific efemp1-modified mutants (efemp12C-Cas9) and phenotypic verification via optomotor responses at 5 days post-fertilization (dpf). (A) The efemp12C-Cas9 fish were generated using 2C-Cas9 somatic gene editing. Mutant fish have three separate transgenes: Tg(rx2:Gal4)×Tg(bact2-loxP-mCherry-loxP-eGFP)×Tg(UAS:Cas9T2ACre;U6:efemp1sgRNA1;U6:efemp1sgRNA2). Co-expression of these transgenic elements result in expression of green fluorescence (eGFP) in zebrafish retina, indicative of successful Cas9 protein expression. (A′) Representative retinal image from a 6 dpf fish. Nuclei stained with DAPI are shown in grey. INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 40 μm. (B) The universally expressed efemp1 sgRNA1 and sgRNA2 from the transgene binds with Cas9 nucleases and cuts exons 3 and 5 of the efemp1 genome DNA (gDNA), respectively. Standard PCR primers used for genotyping the target sites 1 and 2 amplified 525- (Product 1, P1; spinning from the introns before to after the exon 3) and 471-base pairs (bp; P2; spinning from the intron before to the end of exon 5) of DNA sequences, respectively. Products of headloop PCR are 23-bp longer for P1 and 20-bp longer for P2 due to the headloop tags in reverse primers. UTR, untranslated region. (C,D) Gel electrophoresis of the products from standard and headloop PCR for genotyping targeted sites 1 (C) and 2 (D). In both images, the middle lanes show a 100-bp reference ladder; positions of 300 and 500 bp of size are indicated for both gel images. (E–H) Results of optomotor responses. Spatial-frequency tuning functions (E) for 5 dpf efemp1+/+ (n=14) and efemp12C-Cas9 fish (n=13) are three-parameter log-Gaussian functions fit to the data by minimizing the least-square error. The fitted parameters, including (F) normalized amplitude, (G) peak frequency and (H) bandwidth, were compared between groups. Group data are shown as mean±s.e.m. in E and mean with 95% confidence intervals in F–H. *P<0.05 (F-test).

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Biol. Open