FIGURE

Fig. 2

ID
ZDB-FIG-230814-168
Publication
Cigliola et al., 2023 - Spinal cord repair is modulated by the neurogenic factor Hb-egf under direction of a regeneration-associated enhancer
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 2

hb-egfa paralog is required for zebrafish spinal cord regeneration

a Swim capacity of WT (gray) and dKO (red) animals at increasing currents. Data shown as line graphs at increasing timepoints (left) and overlapping violins at each timepoint (right). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA tests with Holm-Šidák correction. p values for sham groups (left graph, dashed lines) are 0.711 and 0.783 at 2 and 6 weeks, respectively. p < 0.0001 in left panel represents comparison of performance over all timepoints. b Sections of WT and hb-egf dKO cords located rostral or caudal to transection site, after anterograde axon tracing at 4 wpi. Quantification in (c) N = 3. d Tissue sections indicating the glial marker GFAP (magenta) and axonal marker acetylated α-Tubulin (yellow) in WT and hb-egfdKO spinal cords at 4 wpi. Dashed lines delineate tissue bridging. Quantification in (e). N = 4. f Swim capacity assayed of WT (gray), hb-egfa (orange), or hb-egfb (dark red) animals. Data shown as line graphs at increasing timepoints (left) and overlapping violins at each timepoint (right). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA tests with Holm-Šidák correction. p values for sham groups (left graph, dashed lines) are 0.730 and 0.236 for aKO vs. WT at 2 and 6 weeks, respectively; 0.862 and 0.681 for bKO vs. WT at 2 and 6 weeks, respectively; 0.830 and 0.562 for aKO vs. bKO at 2 and 6 weeks, respectively. p values shown in left graph represent comparison of performance over all timepoints for injured groups. g Sections of WT and hb-egfaKO spinal cords located rostral or caudal to transection site, after anterograde axon tracing at 4 wpi. Quantification in (h). N = 2. i Tissue sections indicating GFAP (magenta) and acetylated α-Tubulin (yellow) in hb-egfaKO or hb-egfbKO spinal cords at 4 wpi. Dashed lines delineate tissue bridging. Quantification in (j). N = 2. Scale bars 200 μm in (d, i), 100 μm in (b, g). Error bars in (a, f) (left graphs) indicate SEM. A two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was used for comparisons in (c, e, h, j). r rostral, c caudal, d dorsal, v ventral. n = number of animals used for the experiments. Source data provided as Source Data file.

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Nat. Commun.