Figure 9—figure supplement 2.

Methods comparison for event detection in ASAP5 recordings.

(A) Average waveforms of detected events in ASAP5 data for miniML (n = 101 events), template-matching (n = 82 events), and deconvolution (n = 15 events). Data are from the example shown in Figure 9C, shaded areas represent SEM. (B) Recall of events in ASAP5 data versus mEPSP amplitude for miniML, template-matching, and deconvolution. Lines are averages of five recordings with SEM as shaded area. (C) F1 score for event detection in ASAP5 data was higher using miniML (0.53 ± 0.04 , mean ± SEM) than for template-matching (0.39 ± 0.05; Cohen’s d, 1.35) and deconvolution (0.17 ± 0.01; Cohen’s d, 5.1). Bars are median values, n = 5 neurons.

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Elife