Figure 2
- ID
- ZDB-FIG-210218-42
- Publication
- Adikes et al., 2020 - Visualizing the metazoan proliferation-quiescence decision in vivo
- Other Figures
-
- Figure 1
- Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 2
- Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 3
- Figure 3—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 4
- Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 5
- Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 6
- Figure 6—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 7
- Figure 7—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 8—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 8—figure supplement 1.
- All Figure Page
- Back to All Figure Page
(A) SM lineage schematic. (B) Micrographs of a time-lapse showing SM cells at G1 and G0. (C) Quantification of CDK activity in SM cells (n ? 10). (D) Uterine lineage schematic. (E) Micrographs of a time-lapse showing uterine cells at G1 and G0. (F) Quantification of CDK activity in uterine cells (n ? 13). (G) Quantification of CDK activity in SM cells and uterine cells following ectopic expression of CKI-1 (hsp>CKI-1:: mTagBFP2) compared to non-heat shock controls and heat shock animals without the inducible transgene (n ? 36 cells per treatment). Pseudo-colored nuclei magenta, B; cyan, (E) indicate cells of interest. Scale bars = 10 ?m. Dotted line in C and F indicates time of anaphase. Line and shaded error bands depict mean ± SD. Time series measured every 5 min. ns, not significant, ****p?0.0001. Significance determined by statistical simulations; p-values in Supplementary file 1. |