Figure 1
- ID
- ZDB-FIG-201012-85
- Publication
- Heger et al., 2020 - The genetic factors of bilaterian evolution
- Other Figures
-
- Figure 1
- Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 1—figure supplement 2.
- Figure 1—figure supplement 3.
- Figure 2
- Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 2—figure supplement 2.
- Figure 2—figure supplement 3.
- Figure 2—figure supplement 4.
- Figure 3.
- Figure 4
- Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 5
- Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 5—figure supplement 2.
- Figure 5—figure supplement 3.
- Figure 5—figure supplement 4.
- Figure 6
- Figure 6—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 6—figure supplement 2.
- Figure 6—figure supplement 3.
- Figure 7
- Figure 7—figure supplement 1.
- Figure 8.
- All Figure Page
- Back to All Figure Page
(A) Comparison of three major orthology databases with the BigWenDB. The relative contribution of four metazoan clades (Deuterostomia, Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and the paraphyletic group "non-Bilateria") is shown as stacked bar graph. The count of metazoans in our database (175 species) is set to 100%. In comparison to other databases, the BigWenDB has a larger repertoire of critical lophotrochozoans and non-bilaterian Metazoa. (B) Consensus phylogeny describing the relationships of 21 metazoan phyla covered in our database, after Laumer et al., 2015; Telford et al., 2015; Torruella et al., 2015; Cannon et al., 2016. Bold labels to the left or above branches indicate its ancestor (A: Arthropoda, B: Bilateria, D: Deuterostomia, E: Ecdysozoa, Eu: Eumetazoa, L: Lophotrochozoa, M: Metazoa, O: Opisthokonta, P: Protostomia). Numbers in parentheses (after the phylum name) indicate the number of species present from this phylum. Horizontal bars visualise the number of database sequences that belong to a given phylum (logarithmic scale; transcriptomic, ORF, and NCBI sequences summed up). Species silhouettes were downloaded from www.phylopic.org. Morphological innovations of Bilateria according to Baguñà et al., 2008 are highlighted in a shaded box. |