ZFIN Image: Bekri et al., 2018, Fig. 3

Image

Figure Caption

Fig. 3

Glycine signaling defect does not affect GFAP⁺ NSCs subpopulation. (A) Using GFAP as a marker of NSCs subpopulation, GFAP transcripts were analyzed by whole-mount in situ hybridization. No major difference of GFAP⁺ subpopulation was observed between Ctrl-MO (i), and Glr-MO (ii) conditions at 15 and 24 hpf. (B) Double tg(GFAP:GFP; HuC:RFP) line was used to analysis GFAP expression (white) and HuC⁺ expression as mature neurons marker (Bleu). GFAP⁺ signal does not change between Ctrl-MO (i) and Glr-MO (ii) conditions at 24 and 48 hpf. However, a clear decreasing of HuC⁺ signal was observed between Ctrl-MO (i), and Glr-MO (ii) conditions. (C) Quantification of GFAP-GFP embryos upon disruption of glycine signaling does not affect GFAP⁺ subpopulation. For both ISH and IHC, n > 20 embryos per sample. IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization.

Figure Data

Expression / Labeling details

Acknowledgments

This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Front Cell Dev Biol