FIGURE

Fig. 6

ID
ZDB-FIG-151030-17
Publication
Miesfeld et al., 2015 - Yap and Taz regulate retinal pigment epithelial cell fate
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 6

Cell death and proliferation are normal in yap-/- eyes. (A) The numbers of dying cells identified by Acridine Orange staining do not differ in yap-/- mutants at 14 (P=0.8465), 18 (P=0.6542) or 24 (P=0.2558) hpf as compared with wild type. Numbers of eyes analyzed: 14hpf, wt n=31, yap-/- n=5; 18hpf, wt n=39, yap-/- n=10; 24hpf, wt n=24, yap-/- n=16. (B) Eye field mitotic cell counts do not differ between yap+/? (wt) and yap-/- at 14 (P=0.9205), 18 (P=0.4329) and 24 (P=0.2222) hpf. Numbers of eyes analyzed: 14hpf, wt n=38, yap-/- n=6; 18hpf, wt n=38, yap-/- n=6; 24hpf, wt n=36, yap-/- n=6. (C-E′′′) Time-course of expression of tfec:eGFP in prospective RPE cells. (F) Mitotic cell counts of tfec:eGFP+ cells do not differ between wild-type and yap-/- eyes at 14hpf (P=0.5408). Numbers of eyes analyzed: wt n=18, yap-/- n=6. P-values were obtained using an unpaired t-test with equal s.d. Error bars indicate s.e.m. Wild type included full RPE coverage, whereas yap-/- showed some RPE loss.

Expression Data
Gene:
Fish:
Anatomical Term:
Stage Range: 10-13 somites to 14-19 somites

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Development