Fig. 2 The preference for alcohol is biphasic. Gardner–Altman and Cumming estimation plots show alcohol response in 3 min intervals. No stimulus was dispensed in the “Pre” and “Post” periods. Time spent in the stimulus zone during x̄0.5% SAZA condition for A. WT (n = 31,) and D. chrna3C246X mutants (n = 32). Time spent in the stimulus zone in the x̄1.5% SAZA condition for B. WT (n = 30), and E. chrna3C246X mutants (n = 30). C, Ethanol concentrations in the stimulus zone in the x̄0.5% and x̄1.5% alcohol conditions and estimated for extended periods. The concentration at which attraction switches to aversion is highlighted. Asterisks indicate a significant paired mean difference between that time portion and the prestimulus period: *padj < 0.05 (provisional difference), **padj < 0.01 (meaningful difference). See Table S1 for the precise effect sizes and p values, corrected for multiple comparisons.
Image
Figure Caption
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and
ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users.
Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image.
Full text @ J. Neurosci.