FIGURE

Fig. 4

ID
ZDB-FIG-081111-23
Publication
Linney et al., 1999 - Transgene expression in zebrafish: a comparison of retroviral-vector and DNA-injection approaches
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 4

(A, B, and C) Low-power Nipkow disk confocal sections of the embryo illustrated in Fig. 3. These images are of a retroviral vector-produced transgenic embryo. (D, E, and F) Transgenic embryos derived from DNA microinjection. (A) is a section through otic vesicle, (B) is a section through the eye, and (C) is a sagittal section through the tail. Note the nuclear localization of the GFP signal. (D) is a comparison of embryos of the Ef1 α-39 line at 24 h. The upper embryo is derived from a female transgenic parent and the lower embryo is derived from a male transgenic parent. Note that even at 24 h there is a noticeable increase in the GFP signal of the embryo from the female parent. (E) is a 48-h embryo from a female parent and (F) is a 48-h embryo from a male parent. The difference is GFP signal diminishes by this developmental time.

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image.

Reprinted from Developmental Biology, 213(1), Linney, E., Hardison, N.L., Lonze, B.E., Lyons, S., and DiNapoli, L., Transgene expression in zebrafish: a comparison of retroviral-vector and DNA-injection approaches, 207-216, Copyright (1999) with permission from Elsevier. Full text @ Dev. Biol.