header logo image header logo text
Downloads Login
Research
General Information
ZIRC
ZFIN ID: ZDB-PUB-110518-34
Distinct Contributions of Angiogenesis and Vascular Co-option during the Initiation of Primary Microtumors and Micrometastases
Zhao, C., Yang, H., Shi, H., Wang, X., Chen, X., Yuan, Y., Lin, S., and Wei, Y.
Date: 2011
Source: Carcinogenesis   32(8): 1143-50 (Journal)
Registered Authors: Lin, Shuo
Keywords: angiogenesis, vessel co-option, microtumor, micrometastase
MeSH Terms:
  • Animals
  • Animals, Genetically Modified
  • Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics
  • Humans
  • Mice
  • Microvessels/pathology*
  • Models, Biological
  • Neoplasm Metastasis*
  • Neoplasms, Experimental/blood supply*
  • Neoplasms, Experimental/pathology*
  • Neovascularization, Pathologic*
  • Tumor Cells, Cultured
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2/physiology
  • Zebrafish
PubMed: 21515914 Full text @ Carcinogenesis
ABSTRACT
Primary tumors and metastases have been thought to initiate avascularly as multicellular aggregates and later induce angiogenesis, or initiate vascularly by co-opting preexisting host blood vessels without inducing angiogenesis. These two distinct concepts of microtumor vascularization have raised significant controversies. To clarify intratumoral vascularization and tumor cell behaviors at single-cell level during the earliest stage of microtumor initiation, we established primary and metastatic microtumor models in Tg(flk1:EGFP) transgenic zebrafish. We found that tumor cells preferred to initiate avascularly as multicellular aggregates and only later (50-100 cells in size) induced angiogenesis in blood-supply-sufficient microenvironments. In blood-supply-deficient microenvironments, less tumor cells (20-30 cells per fish) managed to co-opt and migrate along host vessels, whereas more tumor cells (100-300 cells per fish) could immediately induce angiogenesis without obvious cell migration. In a metastatic model, we clearly observed that tumor cells co-opted, migrated along and proliferated on the surface of host vessels at an early stage after they extravasated from host vessels, and induced angiogenesis later when micromatastases comprised only 15-30 tumor cells. Moreover, the inducement of neo-vessels accelerated the growth of micromatastases in size, meanwhile, decreased the migration of tumor cells on the surface of host vessels. These results suggest that vessel co-option and angiogenesis has distinct contributions during the initiation of microtumors. Microtumors initiated reasonably through co-opting host vessels or inducing angiogenesis, depending on the differences of local microenvironments and cell numbers in microtumors. The results in this study may have important implications for the therapeutic application of antiangiogenic strategies.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION