IMAGE

Fig. 4

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-170424-6
Source
Figures for Schmitner et al., 2017
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. 4

Identification of progenitor cells in the regenerating exocrine pancreas. (A) Timeline of short-term regeneration experiments shown in B-E indicating the time window of Dim treatment (red, 7-9 dpf), starting point of EdU treatment (0 dpa) and the fixation time (2 dpa). (B-E) Confocal image projection showing different lineage reporters (green), CPA antibody signals (blue), EdU signals (white, arrows indicate proliferating CPA+ cells) and E2Crimson (red; in C, E2Crimson and EdU staining are both shown white due to the Tp1:H2B-mcherry background). Note that CPA+ cells are negative for duct/NRC reporter expression in Tp1:eGFP (B), Tp1:H2B-mcherry (C) and nkx2.2:eGFP (D), whereas CPA signals match expression of ptf1a:GFP (E). (F,G) Comparison of reporter expression for NRCs (Tp1:H2B-mcherry, white), Ptf1a+(ptf1a:eGFP; green) and ela3l+ (ela:casp8, red) in triple transgenic larva at 2 dpa (F) and 8 dpa (G). NRCs signals localize next to Ptf1a+ cells at 2 dpa (F) and they intermingle with Ptf1a+ and ela3l+ labels at 8 dpa (G), but they do overlap with these markers. Scale bars: 20 µm.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Dis. Model. Mech.