header logo image header logo text
Downloads Login
Research
General Information
ZIRC
ZFIN ID: ZDB-FISH-150901-5162
Fish name: edn1tf216b/tf216b
Genotype: edn1tf216b/tf216b
Targeting Reagent: none
Current Source: Nüsslein-Volhard Lab (alive)
HUMAN DISEASE MODELED by edn1tf216b/tf216b
No data available
GENE EXPRESSION
Gene expression in edn1tf216b/tf216b
RNA expression
Expressed Gene Structure Conditions Figures
alcama standard conditions Fig. 3 with imageFig. S2 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
barx1 standard conditions Fig. 3 with imageFig. 8 with imageFig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
Fig. 9 with image from Walker et al., 2006
dlx2a standard conditions Fig. 1 with imageFig. S2 with image from Xu et al., 2018
Fig. 6 with image from Barske et al., 2016
Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2011
Fig. 4 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
Fig. 6 with image from Walker et al., 2006
Fig. 5 with image from Miller et al., 2000
dlx3b standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
Fig. 6 with image from Walker et al., 2006
Fig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
heat shock Fig. 5 with image from Zuniga et al., 2011
dlx5a standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
Fig. 4 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
Fig. 6 with image from Walker et al., 2006
dlx6a standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
Fig. 6 with image from Walker et al., 2006
edn1 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Miller et al., 2000
ednraa standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Nair et al., 2007
en2a standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Miller et al., 2003
epha4b standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
foxc1a standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Xu et al., 2018
foxc1b standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Xu et al., 2018
foxd1 standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Xu et al., 2018
foxd2 standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Xu et al., 2018
foxf1 standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Xu et al., 2018
frzb standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Kamel et al., 2013
fzd7a standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Kamel et al., 2013
grem2b standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2011
gsc standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
hand2 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
Fig. 7 with imageFig. 8 with image from Nair et al., 2007
Fig. 7 with image from Walker et al., 2006
Fig. 5 with image from Miller et al., 2000
heat shock Fig. 5 with image from Zuniga et al., 2011
hey1 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
irx5a standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Askary et al., 2015
irx7 standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Askary et al., 2015
jag1b standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
l1camb standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
mef2ca control Fig. 5 with image from Miller et al., 2007
msx1a standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
heat shock Fig. 5 with image from Zuniga et al., 2011
myod1 standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
nkx3-2 standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Kamel et al., 2013
Fig. 4 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
Fig. 3 with image from Miller et al., 2003
notch2 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
prrx1a standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Barske et al., 2016
prrx1b standard conditions Fig. 6 with imageFig. 8 with image from Barske et al., 2016
satb2 standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Sheehan-Rooney et al., 2013
shha standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
sox9a standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Askary et al., 2015
wnt9a standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Kamel et al., 2013
Reporter gene expression No data available
PHENOTYPE
Phenotype in edn1tf216b/tf216b
Phenotype Conditions Figures
branchiomeric skeletal muscle development decreased process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
branchiostegal ray decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
Table 1 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
cartilage morphogenesis disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with imageFig. 10 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
ceratobranchial 5 bone decreased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
ceratobranchial 5 bone malformed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
ceratohyal cartilage absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
ceratohyal cartilage aplastic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Nair et al., 2007
Fig. 3 with image from Walker et al., 2006
ceratohyal cartilage decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
Fig. 9 with imageFig. 10 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
ceratohyal cartilage inverted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
ceratohyal cartilage morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 10 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
ceratohyal cartilage structure, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
cleithrum decreased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
cleithrum malformed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
dentary curved caudal, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
dentary fused with maxilla, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
dentary malformed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with imageFig. 3 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
embryonic viscerocranium morphogenesis decreased process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with imageFig. 5 with imageFig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
embryonic viscerocranium morphogenesis disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with imageFig. 8 with image from Miller et al., 2003
head lacks all parts of type ventral intermandibularis anterior, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
head lacks all parts of type ventral intermandibularis posterior, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
hindbrain fzd7a expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Kamel et al., 2013
hyohyoideus decreased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
hyosymplectic cartilage fused with ceratohyal cartilage, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Miller et al., 2000
hyosymplectic cartilage increased width, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
interhyal-epihyal joint absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with imageFig. 10 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
interhyoideus decreased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
interhyoideus physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
mandibular arch skeleton joint absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Walker et al., 2006
mandibular muscle wholly dorsalized, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Miller et al., 2003
maxilla curved caudal, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
maxilla malformed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with imageFig. 3 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
Meckel's cartilage absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
Meckel's cartilage aplastic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
Meckel's cartilage bent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
Meckel's cartilage decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
Fig. 3 with image from Nair et al., 2007
Fig. 3 with image from Walker et al., 2006
Fig. 10 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
Meckel's cartilage fused with palatoquadrate cartilage, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
Meckel's cartilage mislocalised posteriorly, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
Meckel's cartilage morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 10 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
Meckel's cartilage protruding, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
mouth concave 3-D shape, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
mouth quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (tf216b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
neurocranium morphology, normal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
opercle aplastic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 10 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
opercle increased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
opercle increased variability of size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. S4 with image from Askary et al., 2017
Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
opercle size, abnormal standard conditions Table 1 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
opercle cartilaginous joint distended, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with imageFig. 4 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
opercle cartilaginous joint increased thickness, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
ossification disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
palatoquadrate cartilage decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Walker et al., 2006
Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
palatoquadrate cartilage fused with Meckel's cartilage, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Miller et al., 2000
palatoquadrate cartilage fused with hyosymplectic cartilage, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
palatoquadrate cartilage increased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
pharyngeal arch frzb expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Kamel et al., 2013
pharyngeal arch nkx3-2 expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Kamel et al., 2013
pharyngeal arch wnt9a expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Kamel et al., 2013
pharyngeal arch fzd7a expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Kamel et al., 2013
pharyngeal arch neural crest cell prrx1a expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch neural crest cell prrx1b expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch ventral region barx1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch ventral region dlx5a expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch ventral region prrx1b expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch ventral region prrx1a expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 1 foxc1a expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxf1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxd1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxc1b expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxd1 expression decreased distribution, abnormal standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxd2 expression increased distribution, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 malformed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Zuniga et al., 2011
pharyngeal arch 1 position, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 10 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
pharyngeal arch 1 joint physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Miller et al., 2003
pharyngeal arch 1 mesenchymal cell physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with imageFig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 1 ventral region decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 1 ventral region decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 1 ventral region physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with imageFig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 2 foxc1a expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 foxd1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 barx1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 foxc1b expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 foxd1 expression decreased distribution, abnormal standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 foxd2 expression increased distribution, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 malformed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Zuniga et al., 2011
pharyngeal arch 2 position, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 10 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
pharyngeal arch 2 foxf1 expression spatial pattern, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 joint irx7 expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Askary et al., 2015
pharyngeal arch 2 joint irx5a expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Askary et al., 2015
pharyngeal arch 2 mesenchymal cell physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with imageFig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region barx1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region prrx1b expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with imageFig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 3 mesenchymal cell physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with imageFig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 3 ventral region physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with imageFig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 3 skeleton decreased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
pharyngeal arch 3-7 skeleton quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (tf216b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
pharyngeal arch 4 mesenchymal cell physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with imageFig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 4 ventral region physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with imageFig. 6 with image from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 4 skeleton decreased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
pharyngeal arch cartilage ventral region decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch cartilage ventral region morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal pouch 1 physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
splanchnocranium quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (tf216b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
stomodeum mislocalised ventrally, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
symplectic absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Choudhry et al., 2011
Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
symplectic decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Zuniga et al., 2010
ventral hyoid arch morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Kimmel et al., 1998
ventral intermandibularis anterior physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
ventral intermandibularis posterior physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Miller et al., 2000
ventral mandibular arch aplastic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Nair et al., 2007
ventral mandibular arch decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Piotrowski et al., 1996
ventral mandibular arch orientation eye, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Kimmel et al., 2003
whole organism lethal (sensu genetics), abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (tf216b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)

CITATIONS  (24)