IMAGE

Fig. 3

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-240415-41
Source
Figures for Crouzier et al., 2023
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. 3 Neuroprotective effect of Convolamine on learning impairments in 3-month-old Wfs1∆Exon8 mice: (a), (b) spontaneous alternation in the Y-maze; (c) step-through passive avoidance; and (d)–(h) active avoidance in the rectangular water-maze. Animals received Convolamine (0.3 and 1 mg/kg IP) 20 min before the Y-maze session or training sessions for the passive and active avoidance tests. Retention was measured 24 h after training for passive avoidance and 72 h after training for active avoidance, without drug injection. (a) Spontaneous alternation percentage and (b) number of arm entries in the Y-maze test. (c) Step-through latency during the passive avoidance retention session. (d), (e) Active avoidance acquisition profiles in the rectangular water-maze, (f) short-term memory (STM) index, (g) latency to reach the platform location and (h) platform location crossings during the retention sesion. Bar graphs show mean ± SEM and individual data in (a), (b), (f)–(h) and box-and-wisker graphs show median and interquartile range and individual data in (c). The numbers of animals per groups were: n = 6–15 in (a), (b), n = 10–15 in (c), n = 11–17 in (d)–(h). Two-way ANOVAs: F(1,39) = 1.847, p > 0.05 for the genotype, F(1,39) = 12.87, p = 0.0009 for the treatment, F(1,39) = 9.362, p = 0.0040 for the interaction in (a); F(1,39) = 0.3975, p > 0.05 for the genotype, F(1,39) = 0.2478, p > 0.05 for the treatment, F(1,39) = 0.4856, p > 0.05 for the interaction in (b); F(1,49) = 1.220, p > 0.05 for the genotype, F(1,49) = 0.3765, p > 0.05 for the treatment, F(1,49) = 1.608, p > 0.05 for the interaction in (f); F(1,49) = 5.867, p = 0.0192 for the genotype, F(1,49) = 2.993, p > 0.05 for the treatment, F(1,49) = 4.442, p = 0.0402 for the interaction in (g); F(1,49) = 2.388, p > 0.05 for the genotype, F(1,49) = 2.388, p > 0.05 for the treatment, F(1,49) = 6.633, p = 0.0131 for the interaction in (h). Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA: H = 16.53, p = 0.0009 in (c). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus V-treated Wfs1WT group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 versus V-treated Wfs1∆Exon8 group; ††† p < 0.001 versus“0” level; Dunnett's test in (a), (b), (g), (h), Dunn's test in (c), one-column t-test in (f).

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Phytother. Res.