IMAGE

Figure 4

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-240116-4
Source
Figures for Wang et al., 2023
Image
Figure Caption

Figure 4 Body curvature in slc6a9 mutant zebrafish.

(A) Axial curvature of slc6a9 mutant zebrafish at 7 dpf. The severity of the curvature is measured by θ angle. (B) Spinal curvature of slc6a9 mutant zebrafish at 21 dpf. (C) Curvature phenotype and micro-CT images of WT and slc6a9m/+ zebrafish at adolescent stage (35 dpf). Images are shown in either side or dorsal view. A, anterior; P, posterior; L, left; R, right. (D) Axial curvature of WT zebrafish larvae treated with vehicle or GLYT1 inhibitor ALX 5407 (1 μM). (E) Quantification of axial curvature in WT and slc6a9m/+ zebrafish treated with vehicle (Veh) or low-dose ALX5407 (ALX, 10 nM). Only 10% of slc6a9m/+ fish showed axial curvature (θ ≥10°), whereas 10 nM ALX5407 induced axial curvature in 4.65% of WT and 34.9% of slc6a9m/+ fish. (F) Quantification of axial curvature in slc6a9m/m zebrafish with and without injection of 200 pg SLC6A9 WT or mutant (Y206F or R662W) mRNAs. Scale bars: 1 mm (A and D); 2 mm (B and C). In all charts, boxes show the median and IQRs with all individual data points superimposed. The number of analyzed fish and the penetrance of curvature (θ ≥10°) are quantified and indicated for each genotype. Unpaired Student’s t test (D) or 1-way ANOVA test (A, E, and F). **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Journal of Clin. Invest.