IMAGE

Fig. 2

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-221118-29
Source
Figures for Wang et al., 2022
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. 2 a Overall structure of the full-length LPD-3 assembled from four segments whose structures were separately predicted by AlphaFold v2.0, with both N and C-termini noted. b Cross-sectional view of the LPD-3 structure showing the hydrophobic tunnel running continuously along the entire inside. c Ribbon representation of the N-terminal part of LPD-3, with the G200E mutation indicated in yellow. d Structure of the LPD-3 C-terminus showing an amphiphilic patch (hydrophobic, red; hydrophilic, blue) that was used to generate mCherry-fused LPD-3 reporters. e Representative fluorescence images showing co-localization (arrow heads) of ER membrane markers with a mCherry fusion reporter of the LPD-3 N-terminus (rpl-28p::LPD-3Nt::mCherry with LPD-3 a.a. 1-72, unc-54p::GFP as co-injection marker). f Representative fluorescence images (from two independent transgenic extrachromosomal arrays #1 and #2) showing co-localization (arrow heads) of Akt-PH::GFP that binds to PM-PIP3 with a mCherry fusion reporter (ges-1p::mCherry::LPD-3Ct, a.a. 3945-4018) of the LPD-3 C-terminus. g Representative confocal fluorescence images showing endogenous LPD-3::GFP (generated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in and split GFP complementation) in apposition with mScarlet::SP-12(ER). h Representative confocal fluorescence images showing endogenous LPD-3::GFP that co-localizes (arrow heads) with mScarlet::MAPPER, a marker for ER-PM junctions. Scale bar, 50 µm.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Nat. Commun.