ZFIN Image: Romero et al., 2018, Fig. 7

Image

Figure Caption

Fig. 7

ROS and Hedgehog signalling do not have similar roles during tail development. a DPI treatment at 100??M from 14 to 24 hpf does not affect larval tail morphology (10/10, number of experiments?=?3). Scale bar is 200??m. b shha and ihhb expression in the tail is not affected by DPI treatment at 100??M from 14 to 18 hpf (20/20 for all panels, number of experiments?=?2). c tcf7 and raldh2 expression in the tail bud is not affected by treatment with 20??M cyclopamine from 8 to 16 hpf (20/20 for all panels, number of experiments?=?2). d Loss of Hedgehog signalling does not affect tail formation. Larvae were treated with 20??M cyclopamine from 8 to 10hpf (10/10, number of experiments?=?2). Homozygous smo^b577 mutants (7/7, number of experiments?=?2) lack zygotic Hedgehog signalling activity. Embryos were manually dechorionated prior to chemical treatment

Acknowledgments

This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Nat. Commun.