FIGURE

Fig. 3

ID
ZDB-FIG-230721-42
Publication
de Prisco et al., 2023 - Alternative polyadenylation alters protein dosage by switching between intronic and 3'UTR sites
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 3

Intronic and 3′UTR PAS usage tracks with gene and protein expression change.

(A) Volcano plots of DEGs in fibroblasts from subjects 8 and 11 relative to age-matched controls (B) GSEA of preranked mRNA with intronic (top) or 3′UTR PAS usage (bottom) intersected with DEGs from subject 8 ranked from the most up-regulated to the most down-regulated gene. (C) DEPs in subjects 8 and 11 compared to three healthy age-matched controls, each in triplicate. (D) Preranked GSEA of mRNA with intronic PAS usage (top) and 3′UTR PAS usage (bottom) intersected with quantitative proteomics from subject 8 ranked from the most up-regulated to the most down-regulated protein. ES, GSEA enrichment score. FDR and rank at max are calculated by GSEA (see table S18). (E) Enriched biological categories of transcripts with intronic or 3′UTR PAS in subject 8. Notably, all mRNA undergoing intronic APA use were down-regulated (blue), whereas those undergoing 3′UTR APA resulted in up-regulated (red) protein expression. Each dot represents a protein belonging to a specific biological category. In (A) and (C), the vertical dashed lines indicate the log2 FC ≥ 0.263 (1.2 FC) for the up-regulated genes (A) or proteins (C) and log2 FC ≤ −0.263 (−1.2 FC) for the down-regulated genes (A) or proteins (C). The horizontal dashed line indicates the −log10 (P adjusted) ≥ 1.325 (P adjusted ≤ 0.05).

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Sci Adv