PUBLICATION

Skeletal muscle regeneration in Xenopus tadpoles and zebrafish larvae

Authors
Cavaco Rodrigues, A.M., Christen, B., Marti, M., and Izpisua Belmonte, J.C.
ID
ZDB-PUB-120301-19
Date
2012
Source
BMC Developmental Biology   12(1): 9 (Journal)
Registered Authors
Izpis├║a Belmonte, Juan Carlos
Keywords
none
MeSH Terms
  • Animals
  • Cell Cycle
  • Cell Dedifferentiation
  • Cell Tracking
  • Extremities/physiology
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
  • Genes, Reporter
  • Green Fluorescent Proteins/biosynthesis
  • Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics
  • Larva/cytology
  • Larva/physiology*
  • Muscle Fibers, Skeletal/metabolism
  • Muscle Fibers, Skeletal/physiology
  • Muscle, Skeletal/cytology
  • Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism
  • Muscle, Skeletal/physiology*
  • Regeneration*
  • Tail/cytology
  • Tail/physiology
  • Xenopus/metabolism
  • Xenopus/physiology*
  • Zebrafish/metabolism
  • Zebrafish/physiology*
PubMed
22369050 Full text @ BMC Dev. Biol.
Abstract

Background

Mammals are not able to restore lost appendages, while many amphibians are. One important question about epimorphic regeneration is related to the origin of the new tissues and whether they come from mature cells via dedifferentiation and/or from stem cells. Several studies in urodele amphibians (salamanders) indicate that, after limb or tail amputation, the multinucleated muscle fibres do dedifferentiate by fragmentation and proliferation, thereby contributing to the regenerate. In Xenopus laevis tadpoles, however, it was shown that muscle fibres do not contribute directly to the tail regenerate. We set out to study whether dedifferentiation was present during muscle regeneration of the tadpole limb and zebrafish larval tail, mainly by cell tracing and histological observations.

Results

Cell tracing and histological observations indicate that zebrafish tail muscle do not dedifferentiate during regeneration. Technical limitations did not allow us to trace tadpole limb cells, nevertheless we observed no signs of dedifferentiation histologically. However, ultrastructural and gene expression analysis of regenerating muscle in tadpole tail revealed an unexpected dedifferentiation phenotype. Further histological studies showed that dedifferentiating tail fibres did not enter the cell cycle and in vivo cell tracing revealed no evidences of muscle fibre fragmentation. In addition, our results indicate that this incomplete dedifferentiation was initiated by the retraction of muscle fibres.

Conclusions

Our results show that complete skeletal muscle dedifferentiation is less common than expected in lower vertebrates. In addition, the discovery of incomplete dedifferentiation in muscle fibres of the tadpole tail stresses the importance of coupling histological studies with in vivo cell tracing experiments to better understand the regenerative mechanisms.

Genes / Markers
Figures
Show all Figures
Expression
Phenotype
Mutation and Transgenics
Human Disease / Model Data
Sequence Targeting Reagents
Fish
Antibodies
Orthology
Engineered Foreign Genes
Mapping
Errata and Notes