ZFIN ID: ZDB-PUB-081001-1
Distinct roles of Shh and Fgf signaling in regulating cell proliferation during zebrafish pectoral fin development
Prykhozhij, S.V., and Neumann, C.J.
Date: 2008
Source: BMC Developmental Biology   8(1): 91 (Journal)
Registered Authors: Neumann, Carl J.
Keywords: none
MeSH Terms:
  • Animals
  • Cell Proliferation*
  • Extremities/embryology*
  • Extremities/physiology
  • Fibroblast Growth Factor 4/physiology*
  • G1 Phase/genetics
  • G1 Phase/physiology
  • Hedgehog Proteins/genetics
  • Hedgehog Proteins/physiology*
  • Humans
  • Limb Buds/embryology
  • Limb Buds/physiology
  • Mutation
  • Recombinant Proteins/pharmacology
  • S Phase/genetics
  • S Phase/physiology
  • Signal Transduction/physiology*
  • Zebrafish/embryology*
PubMed: 18811955 Full text @ BMC Dev. Biol.
BACKGROUND: Cell proliferation in multicellular organisms must be coordinated with pattern formation. The major signaling pathways directing pattern formation in the vertebrate limb are well characterized, and we have therefore chosen this organ to examine the interaction between proliferation and patterning. Two important signals for limb development are members of the Hedgehog (Hh) and Fibroblast Growth Factor (Fgf) families of secreted signaling proteins. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) directs pattern formation along the anterior/posterior axis of the limb, whereas several Fgfs in combination direct pattern formation along the proximal/distal axis of the limb. In addition, a reciprocal feedback loop operates between Shh and Fgf signaling in the limb bud, resulting in a mutual interdependence of the two signals. Due to this feedback loop, it has been challenging to determine the relative importance of each pathway for proliferation in this organ. RESULTS: We used the genetic and pharmacological amenability of the zebrafish model system to dissect the relative importance of Shh and Fgf signaling in regulating proliferation during development of the pectoral fin buds. In zebrafish mutants disrupting the shh gene, proliferation in the pectoral fin buds is initially normal, but later is strongly reduced. Correlating with this reduction, Fgf signaling is normal at early stages, but is later lost in shh mutants. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of Hh signaling for short periods has little effect on either Fgf signaling, or on expression of G1- and S-phase cell-cycle genes, whereas long periods of inhibition lead to downregulation of both. In contrast, even short periods of pharmacological inhibition of Fgf signaling lead to strong disruption of proliferation in the fin buds, without affecting Shh signaling. To directly test the ability of Fgf signaling to regulate proliferation in the absence of Shh signaling, we implanted beads soaked with Fgf protein into shh mutant fin buds. We find that Fgf-soaked beads rescue proliferation in the pectoral find buds of shh mutants, indicating that Fgf signaling is sufficient to direct proliferation in zebrafish fin buds in the absence of Shh. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have shown that both Shh and Fgf signaling are crucial for outgrowth of the vertebrate limb. The results presented here show that the role of Shh in this process is indirect, and is mediated by its effect on Fgf signaling. By contrast, the activity of the Fgf pathway affects proliferation directly and independently of its effect on Shh. These results show that Fgf signaling is of primary importance in directing outgrowth of the limb bud, and clarify the role of the Shh-Fgf feedback loop in regulating proliferation.