RVFV infection in zebrafish larvae resulting in viral replication and innate immune response. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental timeline, conditions, and injection site. Drawings acquired through BioRender. (B) Viral RNA copies of RVFV35/74 per zebrafish larva. Mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) of 5–8 pools of 10 larvae from 8 independent experiments. The dotted line shows limit of quantification (LOQ). (C) Titres of RVFV35/74 infectious viral particles in zebrafish larvae. Mean ± s.e.m. of 6 pools of 10 larvae from 6 independent experiments. (D) Relative fold induction of infϕ1, mxa, isg-15, and rsad2 in RVFV35/74 infected zebrafish larvae compared to PBS-injected zebrafish larvae. Results determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to 18 s, ef1α, and β-actin at 0 dpi. Mean ± s.e.m. of 8 pools of 10 larvae from 8 independent experiments. (E) Viral RNA copies of RVFV35/74 per zebrafish larva after immersion in Danieau’s solution containing the vehicle, 1000 µM, or 10 mM 2′-FdC at 0 dpi. Mean ± s.e.m. of 5 pools of 10 larvae from 5 independent experiments. The dotted line shows LOQ. dpf = days post fertilization; dpi = days post infection; RVFV = Rift Valley fever virus; 2′-FdC = 2′-Fluoro-2′-deoxycytidine; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns = not significant.
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and
ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users.
Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image.
Full text @ Viruses
Your Input Welcome
Thank you for submitting comments. Your input has been emailed to ZFIN curators who may contact you if
additional information is required.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.