Fig. 1
(A) Timeline of zebrafish escape and reorientation circuit development. Both behaviors have emerged by 4 dpf. Letters correspond to panels in this figure. Circles indicate time of heat shock; squares indicate time of behavioral testing.
(B) Fluorescent image of Tg(hsp70:CaSR-EGFP, myl7:GFP) larva without (top) and with (bottom) heat shock. Arrow indicates heart label used for embryo pre-sorting. Scale bar represents 500 um.
(C) Average relative startle bias of 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) sibling and mutant Tg(hsp70:CaSR-EGFP,myl7:GFP) larvae subject to no heat shock or to heat shock at 1 dpf. Blue circles indicate CaSR WT and heterozygous siblings; red squares indicate CaSR homozygous mutants. n.s. incidates p > 0.05.
(D) Average relative startle bias of 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) sibling and mutant Tg(hsp70:CaSR-EGFP,myl7:GFP) larvae subject to no heat shock or to heat shock at 4 dpf. Results are from three experiments. **** incidates p < 0.0001. n.s. incidates p>0.05.
(E) Average relative startle bias of 6 dpf sibling and mutant Tg(hsp70:CaSR-EGFP,myl7:GFP) larvae subject to no heat shock or to heat shock at 5 dpf. No transgene control siblings vs. mutants p = 0.007. No transgene control vs. transgenic mutants, p = 0.0145. n.s. incidates p > 0.05. In (C), (D), and (E), solid lines indicate median; dashed lines indicate quartiles. All p values in (C), (D), and (E) are from Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc test.