ZFIN Image: Kang et al., 2022, Figure 4

Image

Figure Caption

Figure 4

Validation of single cell RNA data showing upregulated glucagon expression in gcgr^?/?zebrafish ?cells.A, whole mount in situ hybridization analysis of gcga and gcgb in the control and gcgr^?/? ? cells. The scale bar represents 100um, Scale bar in inset = 10um. B, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of gcga and gcgb in control and gcgr^?/? ? cells. The scale bars represent 10 ?m. C, representative images of the fluorescence (green) and intensity (rainbow) of ?-cells from Tg(gcga:GFP) and gcgr^?/?;Tg(gcga:GFP) zebrafish. The scale bars represent 10 ?m. D, quantification of the ?-cell number from Tg(gcga:GFP) and gcgr^?/?;Tg(gcga:GFP) zebrafish. E, quantification of fluorescence intensity from Tg(gcga:GFP) and gcgr^?/?;Tg(gcga:GFP) zebrafish. F, the average fluorescence intensity in each ?-cell from Tg(gcga:GFP) and gcgr^?/?;Tg(gcga:GFP) zebrafish. D?F, data represent mean � SD with significance determined by unpaired two-tailed t test, ? p< 0.05; ?? p< 0.01. G?L, hyperexpression and hyperplasia of glucagon in gcgr^?/? ?-cells was inhibited by a high level of glucose. G?I, representative EdU staining images (G), ?-cell quantification (H), and EdU-positive ?-cell quantification (I) of different genotype larvae treated by high-level glucose. GFP+ and EdU+ cells represent the proliferative ?-cells, which are indicated by arrows. Data represent mean � SD with significance determined by two-way ANOVA, ? p< 0.05. The number of larvae (n) =20 to 36 for 4H, 5 to 8 for 4I. ANOVA results for 4H: interaction: F (1, 112) = 3.047, p = 0.0836; Row factor (control versus gcgr^?/?): F (1, 112) = 15.16, p = 0.0002; Column factor (glucose treatment): F (1, 112) = 3.141, p = 0.0791. ANOVA results for 4I: interaction: F (1, 26) = 3.252, p = 0.083; Row factor (control versus gcgr^?/?): F (1, 26) = 3.252, p = 0.083; Column factor (glucose treatment): F (1, 26) = 12.86, p = 0.0014. J, representative images of the fluorescence (green) and intensity (rainbow) of ?-cells from Tg(gcga:GFP), gcgr^?/?;Tg(gcga:GFP) zebrafish, and high glucose-treated Tg(gcga:GFP) and gcgr^?/?;Tg(gcga:GFP) zebrafish. The images are confocal projections; the scale bars represent 10 ?m. K?L, quantification of total fluorescence intensity of GFP (K), and average fluorescence intensity of GFP per cell (L) from Tg(gcga:GFP), gcgr^?/?;Tg(gcga:GFP) zebrafish, and high glucose-treated Tg(gcga:GFP) and gcgr^?/?;Tg(gcga:GFP) zebrafish. Data represent mean � SD with significance determined by two-way ANOVA, ? p< 0.05; ?? p< 0.01, ???p < 0.001. The number of larvae (n) =9 to 11 ANOVA results for 4K: interaction: F (1, 39) = 1.789, p = 0.1887; Row factor (control versus gcgr^?/?): F (1, 39) = 15.60, p = 0.0003; Column factor (glucose treatment): F (1, 39) = 6.641, p = 0.0139. ANOVA results for 4L: interaction: F (1, 39) = 1.553, p = 0.2201; Row factor (control versus gcgr^?/?): F (1, 39) = 12.00, p = 0.0013; Column factor (glucose treatment): F (1, 39) = 7.076, p = 0.0113.

Acknowledgments

This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ J. Biol. Chem.