Fig. 8 a Bright-field images of the head (purple dashed line) in fish expressing WT and mutant ARF3 at 48 hpf (the inset for ARF3K127E documents a severe case). The images are representative of embryos from two independent batches. b?b? Head area quantification at 48 hpf (b) and 4.5 dpf (b?). In b, set 1: no. of embryos = 25 (not injected), 23 (WT); 22 (K127E, ***p = 0.0002) and 25 (L12V/D67V, *p = 0.0106) of one batch; set 2: no. of embryos = 29 (WT); 28 (P47S); 30 (D93N); 29 (T32N). in b?, no. of embryos = 30 (not injected); 30 (WT); 27 (P47S); 30 (D93N, ***p = 0.0006) and 28 (T32N) of one batch. Data are expressed as box-and-whisker with median (middle line), 25th?75th percentiles (box), and min?max values (whiskers). All the data points and the mean (?+?) are also shown. b? Schematics of the brain volume reduction in human patients harboring a subset of ARF3 mutants and in zebrafish models generated in this study. The human brain in the illustration was created with BioRender.com and modified using Illustrator (Adobe). A summary of OFC and brain malformations data from patients in this study are depicted below (no sign of brain malformation (?), mild (+), moderate (++), and severe (+++) malformations). (c) Volumetric reconstructions (c) and anterior brain volume (white dashed line) from live confocal acquisitions from whole brains of 48hpf Tg(NBT:dsRed) fish injected with mRNA encoding WT and ARF3 mutants. The images are representative of embryos from two independent batches for WT, K127E, and L12V/D67V and from one batch for the other mutants. OT: optic tectum, Ce: cerebellum, Fb: forebrain, Mb: midbrain, Hb: hindbrain. c? Quantification of the brain volume. Set 1: no. of embryos = 4 (WT); 4 (K127E, *p = 0.0163) from one batch; set 2: no. of embryos = 3 (WT); 3 (L12V/D67V, **p = 0.0029); 4 (P47S, *p = 0.0350 and D93N, ***p = 0.0010) of one batch. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Different datasets for the same measurement are shown in adjacent plots with the internal WT control for each set, not injected controls between batches are not significantly different. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett?s multiple comparison post hoc test (b, left panel; c?, right panel), Krustal?Wallis followed by Dunn?s multiple comparison post hoc test (b, right panel; b?), unpaired t-test with Welch?s correction (c?, left panel) are used to assess statistical significance. Source data are provided as a Source data file.
Image
Figure Caption
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and
ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users.
Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image.
Full text @ Nat. Commun.