Cell proliferation in the palate was restored by combinatorial treatment with the teratogen and Wnt agonists. (A) Immunofluorescence images of proliferative cells of the plate at 96 hpf. Experimental time course is the same as in Figure 4A. WAF (30 μM) exposure induced cleft palate and decreased the number of pH3-positive cells in the palate. The number of pH3-positive cells was restored by combinatorial treatment with BIO (100 nM), CHIR99021 (300 nM) or WAY-262611 (250 nM). Green indicates cartilage cells double stained with anti-coll2 antibody and lectin PNA. White dotted lines trace the shape of the palate. Magenta indicates proliferative cells stained with anti-pH3 antibody. (B) Quantification of the number of pH3-positive cells in the palate. Numerical value was normalized to 104 μm2. (C) VPA (20 μM) exposure induced cleft palate and the number of pH3-positive cells was decreased. The number of pH3-positive cells was restored by combinatorial treatment with BIO (100 nM), CHIR99021 (300 nM) or WAY-262611 (250 nM). (D) Quantification of the number of pH3-positive cells in the palate. Numerical value was normalized to 104 μm2. n = 12 (Control), 15 (WAF), 12 (WAF + BIO), 16 (WAF + CHIR), 15 (WAF + WAY) in (B), n = 12 (Control), 14 (VPA), 14 (VPA + BIO), 12 (VPA + CHIR), 13 (VPA + WAY) in (D), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test). Scale bar: 50 μm.
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and
ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users.
Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image.
Full text @ Front Cell Dev Biol
Your Input Welcome
Thank you for submitting comments. Your input has been emailed to ZFIN curators who may contact you if
additional information is required.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.