IMAGE

Fig. S1

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-171101-10
Source
Figures for Vendrell-Llopis et al., 2015
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. S1

Reproducibility and robustness of taste responses.

a) An example for the reproducibility/trial-to-trial variability of the taste-evoked neural responses in zebrafish brainstem. b) Pair-wise Pearson’s correlations representing the trial-to-trial variability between neural responses to different tastants in the same fish as supplementary figure 1a. We measured reproducibility (solid boxes) by comparing trial-to-trial variability across same tastants. We also measured robustness (dashed boxes) by comparing individual taste trials to the averaged response to 3 trials of same taste. Note that the tastants with prominent responses e.g. sour, bitter compounds and amino-acids have low trial-to-trial variability and high robustness. In all of our analysis we used the 3 trial average of the taste responses to ensure reproducibility. c) Left: correlations across trial-to-trial variability in individual fish within individual tastants, same as solid boxes from supplementary figure 1b. Right: correlations of individual trials to the average response of all 3 trials (left), same as dashed boxes from supplementary figure 1b. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Sci. Rep.