ZFIN ID: ZDB-FISH-150901-1552
Fish name: mib1ta52b/ta52b
Genotype: mib1ta52b/ta52b
Targeting Reagent: none
HUMAN DISEASE MODELED by mib1ta52b/ta52b
No data available
GENE EXPRESSION
Gene expression in mib1ta52b/ta52b
RNA expression
Expressed Gene Structure Conditions Figures
aanat2 control Fig. 4 from Gothilf et al., 1999
agr2 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Flasse et al., 2013
alcama standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Bernardos et al., 2005
ascl1a standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Flasse et al., 2013
Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
Fig. 3 with image from Cau et al., 2008
Fig. 3 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
chemical treatment: DAPT Fig. 3 with image from Cau et al., 2008
ascl1b standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Ghaye et al., 2015
Fig. 4 with image from Jacob et al., 2014
Fig. 4 with image from Flasse et al., 2013
Fig. 3 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
chemical treatment: pharmaceutical Fig. 4 with image from Jacob et al., 2014
atoh1a standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Gou et al., 2018
Fig. 6 from Mizoguchi et al., 2011
Fig. 4 with image from Millimaki et al., 2007
Fig. S2 from Song et al., 2006
atoh1b standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Millimaki et al., 2007
atoh7 standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Yamaguchi et al., 2005
atp1a1a.2 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Ma et al., 2007
atp1b1a standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Ma et al., 2007
atp1b1b standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Hsiao et al., 2007
Fig. 4,  Fig. 6 from Jänicke et al., 2007
atp6v0cb standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Chung et al., 2010
Fig. 2 from Hwang et al., 2009
atp6v1aa standard conditions Fig. 4,  Fig. 6 from Jänicke et al., 2007
atp6v1f standard conditions Fig. 1 from Hwang et al., 2009
ca2 standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Hsiao et al., 2007
calb2b standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
camkvb control Fig. 4 with image from Won et al., 2006
cbfb standard conditions Fig. 7 from Bresciani et al., 2014
cdh2 standard conditions Fig. 1 from Qiu et al., 2009
cdkn1ca standard conditions Fig. 1 from Park et al., 2005
cga standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Dutta et al., 2008
col2a1a standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
crhb standard conditions Fig. 9 from Mahler et al., 2010
dab2 standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Covassin et al., 2006
dct standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
desma standard conditions Fig. 5 with image,  Fig. 6 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
dla standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Nikolaou et al., 2009
Fig. 3 from Qiu et al., 2009
Fig. 6 with image,  Fig. 7 with image from Riley et al., 2004
Fig. 1 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
dlb standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
Fig. 1 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
dlc standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
Fig. 5 with image from Hsiao et al., 2007
Fig. 1 with image,  Fig. 2 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
text only from Oates et al., 2002
Fig. 3 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
dld standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Matsuda et al., 2009
Fig. 4 with image from Millimaki et al., 2007
Fig. 5 with image from Crosnier et al., 2005
text only from Bingham et al., 2003
Fig. 1 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
dlx5a standard conditions Fig. 8 from Mahler et al., 2010
dnmt3bb.1 standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Gore et al., 2016
drl standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from England et al., 2014
dtx1 standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Cheng et al., 2015
e2f5 standard conditions Fig 6 with image from Xie et al., 2020
ebf2 standard conditions Fig. 4 from Bally-Cuif et al., 1998
efnb2a standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Pendeville et al., 2008
Fig. 6 from Gering et al., 2005
Fig. 3 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
egr2b standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
text only from Bingham et al., 2003
elavl3 standard conditions 10 figures with image from 7 publications
elavl4 standard conditions Fig. 1 from Hwang et al., 2009
epha4a standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
ephb4a standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
etv4 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
etv5b standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
evx1 standard conditions text only from Bingham et al., 2003
fabp2 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Flasse et al., 2013
flt4 standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Shin et al., 2016
Fig. 4 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
chemical treatment by environment: SL-327 Fig. 7 with image from Shin et al., 2016
foxa2 standard conditions Fig. 4 from Porazzi et al., 2012
Fig. 3 with image from Schafer et al., 2007
foxb1a standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3 from Qiu et al., 2009
text only from Cheng et al., 2004
Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
foxi3a standard conditions Fig. 2 with image,  Fig. 3 with image from Hsiao et al., 2007
Fig. 4 from Jänicke et al., 2007
gad1b standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
gad2 standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
gata1a standard conditions Fig. 1 from Burns et al., 2005
gata2a standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
gata3 standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
text only from Bingham et al., 2003
gcga standard conditions Fig. 1 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
gdf3 standard conditions Fig. 2 from Hwang et al., 2009
gemin4 standard conditions Fig. 2 from Hwang et al., 2009
gfap standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Bernardos et al., 2005
gfi1aa control Fig. 4 with image from Thambyrajah et al., 2016
gh1 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Dutta et al., 2008
grin1a standard conditions Fig. 2 from Hwang et al., 2009
hbbe1.1 standard conditions Fig. 6 from Gering et al., 2005
hells standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from England et al., 2014
her1 standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Liedtke et al., 2008
Fig. 5 from Ishitani et al., 2005
text only from Oates et al., 2002
cold exposure Fig. S1 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
her2 standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Cheng et al., 2015
her4.1 standard conditions Fig. 2 from So et al., 2009
Fig. 3 from Tsutsumi et al., 2007
Fig. 5 from Yeo et al., 2007
Fig. 1 with image,  Fig. 2 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
Fig. 5 from Ishitani et al., 2005
Fig. 8 with image from Yamaguchi et al., 2005
her6 standard conditions Fig. 2 from Qiu et al., 2009
Fig. 3 with image from Bernardos et al., 2005
her7 standard conditions text only from Oates et al., 2002
her9 standard conditions Fig. 2 from Qiu et al., 2009
Fig. 5 with image from Ma et al., 2007
hey2 standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
hk1 standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3,  Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
hk2 standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3,  Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
hmx1 standard conditions Figure 1 with image from England et al., 2020
hmx2 standard conditions Figure 1 with image from England et al., 2020
hmx3a standard conditions Figure 1 with image from England et al., 2020
hmx3b standard conditions Figure 1 with image from England et al., 2020
hmx4 standard conditions Figure 1 with image from England et al., 2020
hoxb1a standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
text only from Bingham et al., 2003
id2a control Fig. 5 with image from Chong et al., 2005
ins standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Stetsyuk et al., 2007
Fig. 1 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
irx3a standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Okigawa et al., 2014
Fig. 2 with image from Lewis et al., 2005
isl1a standard conditions Fig. 3 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
Fig. 3 with image from Schafer et al., 2007
Fig. S1 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
Fig. 4 with image from Schäfer et al., 2005
jag2b standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
kcnip3b standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Stetsyuk et al., 2007
kctd12.1 standard conditions Fig. 5 from Aizawa et al., 2007
kctd12.2 standard conditions Fig. 5 from Aizawa et al., 2007
kdrl standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Shin et al., 2016
Fig. 3 from Porazzi et al., 2012
Fig. 1 from Burns et al., 2005
Fig. 6 from Gering et al., 2005
text only from Lawson et al., 2002
chemical treatment by environment: SL-327 Fig. 7 with image from Shin et al., 2016
lcp1 standard conditions Fig. 1 from Burns et al., 2005
ldha standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3,  Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
lhx3 standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
Fig. 3 with image from Dutta et al., 2008
ly97.3 standard conditions Fig. S3 with image from Kawahara et al., 2018
mbnl2 standard conditions Fig. 16 with image from England et al., 2014
mcidas standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zhou et al., 2015
mdka standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Schäfer et al., 2005
mdkb standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Liedtke et al., 2008
mespaa standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Sawada et al., 2000
mespab standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Cutty et al., 2012
Fig. 6 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
mespba standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
Fig. 4 with image from Sawada et al., 2000
mespbb standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Cutty et al., 2012
mib1 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image,  Fig. S3 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
mir200a standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
mnx2a standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
mpx standard conditions Fig. 1 from Burns et al., 2005
mxd3 standard conditions Fig. 1 from Hwang et al., 2009
myb standard conditions Fig. 1 from Burns et al., 2005
heat shock Fig. 2 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Lin et al., 2015
mych standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Hong et al., 2008
myf5 standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
myod1 standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
necab1 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Kim et al., 2008
neurod1 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Flasse et al., 2013
Fig. 1 from Mizoguchi et al., 2011
Fig. 3 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
neurog1 standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Gou et al., 2018
Fig. 5 with image from Cheng et al., 2013
Fig. 3 from Qiu et al., 2009
Fig. 3 with image from Cau et al., 2008
chemical treatment: DAPT Fig. 3 with image from Cau et al., 2008
neurog3 standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
nkx2.2a standard conditions text only from Bingham et al., 2003
nkx2.2b standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Schafer et al., 2007
nkx2.4b standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. S1 from Porazzi et al., 2012
nkx6.1 standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Ghaye et al., 2015
Fig. 1 with image from Okigawa et al., 2014
nort standard conditions Fig. 3 from Tsutsumi et al., 2007
notch1a standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Nikolaou et al., 2009
Fig. 5 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
notch3 standard conditions text only from Lawson et al., 2002
Fig. 3 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
noto control Fig. 3 with image from Cau et al., 2008
chemical treatment: DAPT Fig. 3 with image from Cau et al., 2008
ntn1b standard conditions text only from Bingham et al., 2003
olig2 standard conditions Fig. 7 from Mahler et al., 2010
olig4 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Filippi et al., 2005
otog standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Stooke-Vaughan et al., 2015
otpa standard conditions Fig. 8 from Mahler et al., 2010
pax2a standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2 from Porazzi et al., 2012
Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
pax6b standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
pdx1 standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
pkma standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3,  Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
plvapb standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Covassin et al., 2006
pomca standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Dutta et al., 2008
pou4f1 standard conditions Fig. 5 from Aizawa et al., 2007
prl standard conditions Fig. 3 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Dutta et al., 2008
prss1 standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
Fig. 6 with image from Esni et al., 2004
prune2 standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Anuppalle et al., 2017
ptf1a standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
Fig. 6 with image from Esni et al., 2004
text only from Zecchin et al., 2004
rag1 standard conditions Fig. 1 from Burns et al., 2005
Fig. S1 from Gering et al., 2005
ren standard conditions Fig. 5 from Rider et al., 2015
rfng standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 3 from Qiu et al., 2009
text only from Cheng et al., 2004
rfx2 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image,  Fig. 6 with image from Ma et al., 2007
rho standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Bernardos et al., 2005
ripply1 standard conditions Fig. 2 from Kawamura et al., 2005
runx1 standard conditions Fig. 1 from Mahony et al., 2016
Fig. 1 from Burns et al., 2005
Fig. 6 from Gering et al., 2005
scrt1a control Fig. 4 from Dam et al., 2011
scrt1b control Fig. 4 from Dam et al., 2011
scrt2 control Fig. 4 from Dam et al., 2011
sema3d standard conditions Fig. 4 from Halloran et al., 1999
serinc1 standard conditions Fig. 1 from Hwang et al., 2009
shha standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Schäfer et al., 2005
text only from Bingham et al., 2003
sim1a standard conditions Fig. 8 from Mahler et al., 2010
six1b standard conditions text only from Bessarab et al., 2004
slc1a3a standard conditions Fig. 1 from Hwang et al., 2009
slc2a1a standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3,  Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
slc2a3a standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3,  Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
slc5a5 control Fig. S1 from Porazzi et al., 2012
slc15a1b standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
slc39a7 standard conditions Fig. 1 from Hwang et al., 2009
sox4b standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Mavropoulos et al., 2005
sox7 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Pendeville et al., 2008
sox9a standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
sox9b standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
sox18 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Pendeville et al., 2008
sp8a standard conditions Fig. 27 with image from England et al., 2014
spi1b standard conditions Fig. 1 from Burns et al., 2005
sst2 standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Zecchin et al., 2007
tal1 standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Okigawa et al., 2014
Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
tal2 standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Schafer et al., 2007
tbx20 standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
tecta standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Stooke-Vaughan et al., 2015
tfec standard conditions Fig. 1 from Mahony et al., 2016
tg control Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3 from Porazzi et al., 2012
tshba standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Dutta et al., 2008
txlnbb standard conditions Fig. 2 from Hwang et al., 2009
vcla standard conditions Fig. 5 with image,  Fig. 6 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
vclb standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
vegfaa standard conditions Fig. S6 with image from So et al., 2014
text only from Lawson et al., 2002
vsx1 standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
vsx2 standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Okigawa et al., 2014
Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
wnt1 standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Riley et al., 2004
wu:fj67h05 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Covassin et al., 2006
zbtb8a standard conditions Fig. 32 with image from England et al., 2014
Protein expression
Antibody Antigen Genes Structure Conditions Figures
zrf-2 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
Ab-MF20 standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
zrf-1 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
Fig. 4 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
Ab4-serotonin chemical treatment: pharmaceutical Fig. 5 with image from Jacob et al., 2014
Ab-3A10 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
Ab1-dld standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Matsuda et al., 2009
Ab2-pvalb standard conditions Fig. 4 from Heller et al., 2002
Ab9-mapk standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Shin et al., 2016
Ab1-isl standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
Ab4-serotonin standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Jacob et al., 2014
Ab1-elavl standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Cheng et al., 2013
Ab1-dlc standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Matsuda et al., 2009
Ab3-h3 standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Liu et al., 2013
zrf-4 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
Ab1-serotonin standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
zn-5 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
Ab3-ctnnb standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Matsuda et al., 2009
zn-8 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
Ab1-tuba standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zhou et al., 2015
Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
zrf-3 standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
Ab-2F11 standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Flasse et al., 2013
Fig. 8 with image from Liu et al., 2013
Ab-Pax7 standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
Ab1-calb2 calb2b standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
Ab1-desm desma standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
Reporter gene expression No data available
PHENOTYPE
Phenotype in mib1ta52b/ta52b
Phenotype Conditions Figures
anterior crista absent, abnormal standard conditions text only from Haddon et al., 1998
anterior lateral line placode has extra parts of type sensory neuron, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
anterior mesenteric artery ren expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 from Rider et al., 2015
apoptotic process increased occurrence, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 from So et al., 2009
apoptotic process occurrence, normal control Fig. 5 from Porazzi et al., 2012
auditory epithelial support cell absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image,  text only from Haddon et al., 1998
auditory receptor cell fate specification process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Heller et al., 2002
axis elongation rate, normal standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
axon guidance disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
axon guidance process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Halloran et al., 1999
blood circulation arrested, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 from Rider et al., 2015
brain pkma expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
brain hk1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
brain ldha expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
brain slc2a3a expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
brain hemorrhagic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 from Rider et al., 2015
brain slc2a3a expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
brain pkma expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
brain hk2 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
brain hk1 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
brain ldha expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
brain quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
caudal fin malformed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 from Rider et al., 2015
caudal fin unpigmented, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 from Rider et al., 2015
caudal tuberculum morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 from Mahler et al., 2010
cell population proliferation occurrence, normal control Fig. 5 from Porazzi et al., 2012
central nervous system cellular quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 from Yeo et al., 2007
CiD increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Okigawa et al., 2014
Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
CoSA increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
cristae formation absent, abnormal standard conditions text only from Haddon et al., 1998
determination of left/right symmetry disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Aizawa et al., 2007
diencephalon sema3d expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Halloran et al., 1999
dorsal aorta disorganized, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
dorsal aorta fused with posterior cardinal vein, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
dorsal aorta flt4 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Shin et al., 2016
dorsoventral diencephalic tract axon guidance process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Halloran et al., 1999
ectoderm development disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image,  Fig. 5 with image from Hsiao et al., 2007
embryo development rate, normal standard conditions Fig. S2 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
embryonic pattern specification disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
embryonic structure ren expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 from Rider et al., 2015
enterocyte differentiation decreased occurrence, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 from Rodríguez-Fraticelli et al., 2015
epidermal cell fate specification disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Hsiao et al., 2007
epiphysis has extra parts of type neuron, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Cau et al., 2008
Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
eye decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
eye proliferative region increased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Yamaguchi et al., 2010
eye proliferative region mislocalised, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Yamaguchi et al., 2010
floor plate formation disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Schafer et al., 2007
generation of neurons increased rate, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Aizawa et al., 2007
gut quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
habenula cellular quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Aizawa et al., 2007
habenula neuron morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Aizawa et al., 2007
habenula development disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Aizawa et al., 2007
hair cell anterior macula absent, abnormal standard conditions text only from Haddon et al., 1998
hair cell anterior macula decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
hair cell anterior macula increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Heller et al., 2002
Fig. 5 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
hair cell posterior macula absent, abnormal standard conditions text only from Haddon et al., 1998
hair cell posterior macula decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
hair cell posterior macula increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Heller et al., 2002
Fig. 5 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
head hemorrhagic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell gfi1aa expression absent, abnormal control Fig. 4 with image from Thambyrajah et al., 2016
hindbrain disorganized, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
hindbrain has fewer parts of type radial glial cell, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
hindbrain prune2 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Anuppalle et al., 2017
hindbrain quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
hindbrain dorsal region has fewer parts of type neuron, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
hindbrain epithelium disorganized, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Qiu et al., 2009
hindbrain neuroepithelial cell aggregated, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Qiu et al., 2009
hindbrain radial glial cell disorganized, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
hindbrain radial glial cell increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
hindbrain commissure neuron absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
hindbrain development disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3 from Qiu et al., 2009
hindbrain interneuron increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
hindbrain neural keel concave, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
hypochord ly97.3 expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. S3 with image from Kawahara et al., 2018
inner ear gfi1aa expression increased amount, abnormal control Fig. 4 with image from Thambyrajah et al., 2016
inner ear morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. S7 with image from Obholzer et al., 2012
inner ear hair cell absent, abnormal standard conditions text only from Haddon et al., 1998
integument has fewer parts of type pigment cell, abnormal standard conditions Table 2 from Kelsh et al., 1996
intersegmental vessel flt4 expression decreased amount, abnormal chemical treatment by environment: SL-327 Fig. 7 with image from Shin et al., 2016
intersegmental vessel decreased length, abnormal chemical treatment by environment: SL-327 Fig. 7 with image from Shin et al., 2016
intersegmental vessel disorganized, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
intersegmental vessel vascular sprouts mislocalised, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
intestinal epithelium has fewer parts of type enterocyte, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 from Rodríguez-Fraticelli et al., 2015
intestinal epithelium endocytosis decreased occurrence, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 from Rodríguez-Fraticelli et al., 2015
ionocyte progenitor cell aggregated, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Jänicke et al., 2007
ionocyte progenitor cell irregular spatial pattern, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Jänicke et al., 2007
ionocyte progenitor cell foxi3a expression spatial pattern, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Jänicke et al., 2007
lapillus decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
lapillus hypotrophic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
lateral floor plate composition, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Schafer et al., 2007
Mauthner neuron increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
Mauthner neuron axon fasciculation, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
medial longitudinal fasciculus increased width, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
melanocyte irregular spatial pattern, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
midbrain hindbrain boundary increased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
NaK ionocyte increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4,  Fig. 5 from Jänicke et al., 2007
NaK ionocyte atp1b1b expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Jänicke et al., 2007
nervous system nkx6.1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Ghaye et al., 2015
nervous system dtx1 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Cheng et al., 2015
nervous system ascl1b expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Ghaye et al., 2015
nervous system quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
neural crest tfec expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Mahony et al., 2016
neural plate primary neuron increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
neural retina development disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Imai et al., 2014
neuroepithelial cell circular, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Qiu et al., 2009
optic cup has fewer parts of type radial glial cell, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
otic placode formation increased process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
otic vesicle has extra parts of type hair cell, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Stooke-Vaughan et al., 2015
text only from Riley et al., 1999
otic vesicle has fewer parts of type auditory epithelial support cell, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Stooke-Vaughan et al., 2015
otic vesicle neurog1 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Gou et al., 2018
otic vesicle atoh1a expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Gou et al., 2018
otic vesicle neurog1 expression increased distribution, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Gou et al., 2018
otic vesicle atoh1a expression increased distribution, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Gou et al., 2018
otic vesicle atoh1a expression spatial pattern, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Gou et al., 2018
otic vesicle neurog1 expression spatial pattern, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 9 with image from Gou et al., 2018
otolith development arrested, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
pancreas primordium nkx6.1 expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Ghaye et al., 2015
pancreas primordium nkx6.1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Ghaye et al., 2015
pancreas primordium ascl1b expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Ghaye et al., 2015
pectoral fin actin filament mislocalised, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
pectoral fin myoblast decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
pectoral fin myofibril disheveled, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
pectoral fin cartilage present, normal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
pectoral fin endoskeletal disc disorganized, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
pectoral fin fold morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
pectoral fin musculature present, normal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
pectoral fin musculature contractile fiber malformed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Pascoal et al., 2013
pericardium edematous, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 from Rider et al., 2015
pharyngeal arch 3 epithelium physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
pharyngeal endoderm morphology, normal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Porazzi et al., 2012
Fig. 4 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
pharyngeal vasculature separated from thyroid primordium, abnormal control Fig. 3 from Porazzi et al., 2012
pigment cell quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
pineal complex aanat2 expression increased distribution, abnormal control Fig. 4 from Gothilf et al., 1999
polster increased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
post-vent region increased curvature, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image,  Fig. 2 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
post-vent region lacks all parts of type pigment cell, abnormal standard conditions Table 2 from Kelsh et al., 1996
post-vent region quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
post-vent region melanocyte decreased amount, abnormal cold exposure Table 1 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
post-vent region melanocyte decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image,  Table 1 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
posterior cardinal vein disorganized, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
posterior crista absent, abnormal standard conditions text only from Haddon et al., 1998
posterior lateral line ganglion neuron increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 5 from Mizoguchi et al., 2011
posterior lateral line placode has extra parts of type sensory neuron, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
posterior lateral line primordium cell decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 from Mizoguchi et al., 2011
primary neuron axon fasciculation, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
pronephric duct e2f5 expression increased distribution, abnormal standard conditions Fig 6 with image from Xie et al., 2020
pronephric duct increased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
pronephric tubule has extra parts of type pronephric tubule multi-ciliated epithelial cell, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zhou et al., 2015
pronephric tubule mcidas expression increased distribution, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zhou et al., 2015
pronephros multi-ciliated epithelial cell differentiation increased occurrence, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zhou et al., 2015
retina slc2a1a expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
retina disorganized, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Yamaguchi et al., 2010
retina hk2 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
retinal ganglion cell axon increased accumulation retina ventral region, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Imai et al., 2014
retinal ganglion cell axon guidance process quality, normal standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Imai et al., 2014
retinal pigmented epithelium morphology, normal standard conditions Table 2 from Kelsh et al., 1996
rhombomere increased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
rhombomere morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
Fig. 1 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
rhombomere primary neuron increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Riley et al., 2004
rhombomere boundary formation disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. 3 from Qiu et al., 2009
Rohon-Beard neuron axon guidance process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Halloran et al., 1999
roof plate spinal cord region sema3d expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Halloran et al., 1999
sagitta decreased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
sagitta hypotrophic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
sensory system quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
somite decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Table 1 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
Fig. 5 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
somite decreased amount, abnormal cold exposure Fig. 1 with image,  Table 1 with image from Zhang et al., 2007
somite increased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
somite morphology, abnormal standard conditions Table 1 from van Eeden et al., 1996
somite quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
somite 2 increased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
somite 3 increased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
somite 4 increased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
somite 5 increased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Herrgen et al., 2010
somite border morphology, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
somitogenesis delayed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image,  Fig. 3 with image,  Fig. 4 with image,  Fig. 5 from Herrgen et al., 2010
Fig. 5 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
somitogenesis disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 from Kawamura et al., 2005
Table 1 from van Eeden et al., 1996
somitomeric trunk muscle development process quality, normal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
spinal cord slc2a3a expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
spinal cord ldha expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
spinal cord pkma expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
spinal cord prune2 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Anuppalle et al., 2017
spinal cord hk1 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
spinal cord GABAergic neuron decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 from Yeo et al., 2007
statoacoustic (VIII) ganglion hyperplastic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
statoacoustic (VIII) ganglion increased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 7 with image from Haddon et al., 1998
taste bud physical quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
taste bud formation decreased process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Kapsimali et al., 2011
telencephalon prune2 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Anuppalle et al., 2017
thyroid gland development decreased process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1,  Fig. 2,  Fig. S1 from Porazzi et al., 2012
thyroid primordium disorganized, abnormal control Fig. 1,  Fig. S1 from Porazzi et al., 2012
thyroid primordium increased size, abnormal control Fig. S1 from Porazzi et al., 2012
thyroid primordium increased volume, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 from Porazzi et al., 2012
thyroid primordium mislocalised, abnormal control Fig. 1 from Porazzi et al., 2012
thyroid primordium mislocalised ventrally, abnormal control Fig. 3 from Porazzi et al., 2012
thyroid primordium physical object quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Porazzi et al., 2012
trigeminal ganglion has extra parts of type sensory neuron, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
trigeminal ganglion sensory neuron apoptotic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 from So et al., 2009
trigeminal placode increased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
trunk curved, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
trunk anterior region has fewer parts of type melanocyte, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
trunk melanocyte absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
trunk pigmentation decreased process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Lawson et al., 2001
vasculogenesis disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 6 with image from Pendeville et al., 2008
VeLD decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Okigawa et al., 2014
Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
ventral spinal cord interneuron differentiation disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 8 with image from Batista et al., 2008
ventral spinal cord interneuron specification disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Schafer et al., 2007
ventral wall of dorsal aorta runx1 expression absent, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 from Mahony et al., 2016
ventral wall of dorsal aorta dnmt3bb.1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Gore et al., 2016
ventral wall of dorsal aorta hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell myb expression absent, abnormal heat shock Fig. 2 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Lin et al., 2015
ventral wall of dorsal aorta hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell absent, abnormal heat shock Fig. 2 with image,  Fig. 4 with image from Lin et al., 2015
vH ionocyte atp6v1aa expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Jänicke et al., 2007
vH ionocyte increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4,  Fig. 5 from Jänicke et al., 2007
whole organism pkma expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism ldha expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism slc2a3a expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism slc2a1a expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism elavl3 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism dnmt3bb.1 expression decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Gore et al., 2016
whole organism hk1 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism ldha expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism pkma expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism dtx1 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Cheng et al., 2015
whole organism hk2 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2,  Fig. 4 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism elavl3 expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism slc2a3a expression increased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 from Kuwabara et al., 2018
whole organism lethal (sensu genetics), abnormal standard conditions Fig. for (ta52b) with image from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
whole organism anterior-posterior axis has extra parts of type Rohon-Beard neuron, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
whole organism anterior-posterior axis has extra parts of type primary motor neuron, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996
whole organism medial-lateral axis has extra parts of type Rohon-Beard neuron, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Jiang et al., 1996

CITATIONS  (150)

Your Input Welcome
We welcome your input and comments. Please use this form to recommend updates to the information in ZFIN. We appreciate as much detail as possible and references as appropriate. We will review your comments promptly.
Please check the highlighted fields and try again.
Thank you for submitting comments. Your input has been emailed to ZFIN curators who may contact you if additional information is required.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.